I’m not an explorer by trade but I have done the exploration objectives for the Amarr and Gallente and is it just me or is it just frustrating to explo in low sec? Just tonight I scanned all of the sites in two low sec constellations, like 20+ systems, and I only scanned down one data/relic site. I scanned down plenty of the scc sites that take time but have no benefit for solo explorers. I finished the hack 30 cans in hi sec in about one hour…
Yeah, I hear you…
Personally I don’t think it matters if it’s High, Low or Null Sec space, Data and Relic sites have pretty much been nerfed almost into oblivion…
DMC
o7
What DMC said. Hacking, especially in high/low sec is essentially a waste of time with the nearly worthless loot. I feel that FC has continued to nerf income (particularly high sec income) in order to “incentivize” people to go and become cannon fodder for the null blocks. No thanks.
I find reasonable amounts of sleeper caches and ghost sites in high sec and low sec. I’d say I’d average between 50-100mil in loot from those sites. (excluding lowsec ghost sites, which start at 130mil guaranteed).
In standard data or relic sites the most valuable common loot are the av-composite/cv-composite. I never do the level 1 or level 2 signatures unless I have a cargo scanner so that I don’t waste my time with carbon.
Pick a slow traffic region/constellation for you exploration.
I live in Minmatar space and I have tried systems far from the major areas. Same result.
I too hear you on this .
Low security space is supposed to provide a risk reward style system but I too have found the reward slightly underwhelming of late.
Wormholes are an alternative you could try .
excuse me, do you know that this thing can be obtained from lowsec?
whoever saying that lowsec explo doesnt worth the risk you are just wrong…