Yes Mistress, it will be done…
I’ve watched enough of this mindless drivel. Mute and blacklist. Adios!
I’m notionally alone. An you know it,
If there’s a childlike audience, that fear that I could tell them something terrible in their mind, they will avoid any confrontation. Go Speak with your country Educational system, and ask them to avoid arresting everyone wearing a pink hat… YOU know this is off-topic…
Not me… is teaching kids that opening a poll might get you a permaban..
I’m the one who instills fear??
you meant bro… you have all of my support…
No, you instill rolling eyes.
![]()
I really dont know why all of you are continuing to let this guy rub his stupidity in your faces. Please just put it all to an end and either just dont reply to him or block him. Not throwing the old meat out in the yard will eventually make the vermin go elsewhere.
I get the entertainment thing that some people deliver…but theres a point where it just becomes nails on a chalkboard.
Maybe that’s the problem. Go try to find and join some corp of knowledgeable people where you can discuss your views back and forth and do away with some of your misconceptions.
no you didnt…
I get I hurt your feelings by having differnent opinion on the Internent. Guys from Uedama most likely hurt your feelings too, so you even create this toon specifically to killwhore on them. Pls dont make an alt to killwhore on me, I would rather prefer you bring some counterpoints why marauders shouldnt be nerfed further ![]()
By the way since NOV 2024, when plate/extender bonus reverted, empire marauders’ hulls become 500m cheaper on average, from 1.5b to ~1b now. Too cheap dont you think? As we all(except OP) know, marauders provide premium active defenses and firepower availible to High security space. Yet players who decide to run T2 cheap fits greatly reduce chances to become gank target. To balance out this issue I propose to increase price to build T1 Bastion module to at least 100m total and reduce volume for all Bastion modules to 75m3, so T2 fitted marauders could have a chance to drop some actual loot not just cheap guns and faction battery at best.
so T2 fitted marauders could have a chance to drop some actual loot not just cheap guns and faction battery at best.
So you’re complaining that people are flying their marauders in a thoughtful manner by not fitting bling modules and staying away from gank hot spots? Just seems like common sense to me. People are “doing it right” by not painting a bullseye on their hulls.
I recommend following the OP around since he likes super blingy fits that drop expensive modules.
Aahahah, you made me laugh
but it’s what I think…
except CV Bastion should not make cycles faster, strassing the capacitor, but simply add a passive boost to the repper. Then all faction Bastions should have more resistance than basics, that RF 40% should become 50% and all other 40%… This would normalize a bit this odd situation of 1.5B (not yet, but soon) which is anyway less than 2x type-A Multishield… Blingy and OP 100% Bonus plate got me to 600K EHP and survive a gank. If I’d run a cheap fit I’d be dead with the 100% bonus anyway,
faction Bastion needs a substantial balance rework.
PS: For older players that remember the nano-Vargur, they didn’t need the Bastion to do 100% DMG…
30s cycles, 3s cycles… it doesn’t matter really… we can’t go back as it works now to those times…
Imagine Bastion would simply do not block the ship into siege position.
I Think it’s one option that should be tested also, maybe make a Triglavian Bastion that do not put the ship in Siege mode but gives her +50% Base agility and speed… then the other boosts…
It’s hard.
Every change completely affects all other fields.
Don’t rule out anything, be propositive.
But I think it is worse with T3 cruisers. My cheap armour fitted ENI with 4 neutron blasters has more tank and more DPS ( 886 ) than my 5 times more expensive Proteus with 6 neutron blasters ( 745 DPS ). In fact other than the cloak the modules are very similar.
I just increased the ENI DPS to 986…managed to squeeze in a 1600 steel plate instead of an 800, add an extra magnetic field stabiliser. I love fiddling with ship fittings.
So my ENI for 86m ISK has 200 DPS more than my Tengu for 500m ISK, and not far off the same EHP. OK so its shorter range and no cloak…but is that trade off really worth 420m ISK ? Its all very well ‘balancing’ ships, but cost effectiveness in EVE is probably the most unbalanced thing of all.
Or both fits are bad, we can’t tell unless we see them. ![]()
An ENI beating a Proteus in basically every relevant stats seems… unlikely.
You multiply your active tank for seconds, and that add total EHP to your fit.
You need to know how maths is being used to do those calculations.
It was better to show both with their best bonuses applied than a 1-1 comparison,
It was better like this.
The T1 Raven has a better passive hp/s recharge than even the CN Raven.
Eg: 1000Hp/s rep in a 15s fight, with an omni tank of 80%, it’s 800x15s= 12K EHP. +OMNI= x4= 46KEHP to add to your basic stats of 150K EHP= around 200K EHP.
I’m not making it a passive gen fit bc it would not work the same.
It’s better to teach the audience the method used so they can reproduce it themselves.
You need to know how maths is being used
Didn’t work out out too well for you, now did it?
You need to know how maths is being used to do those calculations.
It’s better to teach the audience the method used so they can reproduce it themselves.
This thread now has my attention again…the ways of the math will be teached to the audience…

the ways of the math will be teached to the audience…
May the maths be with you
Eg: 1000Hp/s rep in a 15s fight, with an omni tank of 80%, it’s 800x15s= 12K EHP. +OMNI= x4= 46KEHP to add to your basic stats of 150K EHP= around 200K EHP.
![]()
So, 1000hp/s * 15sek at 80% resistances equals 12k EHP? Or x4 because OMNI so its 46k EHP? Oookay… what the heck…


