I remember my former CEO threatening sanctions on people who refused to leave their rorqs to join defense fleets… Nullbears.
Is that why he is your former CEO?
You refused to leave your rorq to join defence fleet?
The nullbear issue is real.
Of course, but POCO’s ownership and structures proliferation are problems that you can’t underestimate.
The issue is the gross disparity and backwardness of there being more PvP in HS than in Player NS.
No nullbear but big defense fleets are no fun to me.
Can I have your stuff? 
1 Like
Did you join the defence fleet, or continued rorquing?
no nullbear, no rorq no mining. but rorqs explosions best explosions.
You refused to defend your corp in pvp despite CTA by CEO.
That makes you a nullbear.
While everything you said is true, it’s both useless and misses the mark.
The wardec system is currently broken (and has been for a long time). CCP has finally been ‘motivated’ to do something about it. Whether they were ‘financially’ motivated or were ‘altruistically’ motivated really doesn’t matter at this point. The facts (as presented by CCP): wardec’s are greatly in favor of the attackers, smaller corps mostly greatly curtail their activities during a wardec, and ‘newer’ players tend to not return to EvE after a wardec (apparently in significant numbers).
Hoping that player behavior will somehow change and that small groups will somehow band together to ‘correct’ this problem would be extremely foolish on CCP’s part. They have decided that something needs to be done as they see this as hurting the overall game. Thinking that anything could be done to even the odds when a 5 man corp is wardec’d by a 500 man corp, is foolish. So CCP’s hand has been forced.
And for all those people projecting this on to ganking, just stop. CCP has said nothing about ganking, if ganking was later discovered to be hurting the game, they may decide to do something about it, but realistically ganking while it may cause a setback, it doesn’t prohibit people from playing the game. I believe CCP still considers targeted ganking against their rules (repeatedly killing one person so as to deny them the ability to play the game over an extended period - but that may have changed), nonetheless, that isn’t what’s happening here.
3 Likes
do you understand the “but big defense fleets are no fun to me”? That means tried and disliked. If you don’t fit in , you leave.
4 Likes
It means you wanted to be a part of a large Player NS Corp, so you could PvE there, safely, but dont want to defend it.
Thats what it means.
It also means its stupid there is less PvP in Player NS, than in HS.
Player NS has NO PvP restrictions and the biggest PvE rewards.
HS has the MOST PvP restrictions and the lowest PvE rewards.
This make no sense and is ass-backwards.
Arguing against this is pointless.
This is how it is atm, and how broken it is atm.
Absolute BS, i wanted to live the big battles thrill. I realised it was just a F1 tidi potato mod fest. boring.
Black ops are THE thing.
3 Likes
Sure. Tell everyone to take their mission ships, freighters and mining barges to null.
Why did you join a Player NS corp then?
You figured you can just PvE there in safety for huge rewards, but dont want to defend it in PvP?
Jesus christ, man. Do you really not see the irony?
You have quoted the reason dummy. Why do you ridiculize yourself?
1 Like
“Hi, I want to join your Player NS Corp so I can PvE for best rewards in EVE, with the least risk. HS was too dangerous and too low reward for me. Sorry, no I wont help defend this space, cos I dont want to PvP.”
How do you not see the problems there, dummy?
I was recruited after a fight, for pvp… You brain is jammed.
1 Like
So what PvP and PvE did you do there?
We know you didnt join CTA.
My former corp operations are none of your business. But you are free to check killboards.
2 Likes