It’s not a fact if you don’t have evidence to back the claim up.
2 Likes
please dont… your just going to end up taking us both down that silly route where i have to prove everything and then provide dna samples… which tbvh, is off topic.
1 Like
Ok, so we can just invent facts then or do only the ones count you invent?
It is a fact that wardecs are responsible for the majority of retained players.
3 Likes
well if you want to re-invent the meaning of words according to your own diction thats upto you; if however you can actually read and speak english id suggest you go do that now instead of attempting to split hairs with an exact definition (only one of many) for one word in use at a time. It is i think beneath you and truly a cheap shot that kinda makes you look stupid 
2 Likes
Actually they looked at the numbers. Wardecs against corps that had structures had a 85 times higher kill ratio then against corps the have no structures. Essentially it meant that structure based wars were way more active instead of the “let’s dock up for a week”
1 Like
No, you refuse to accept this “fact”. There is a significant difference.
There is someone who SAW the data, explained it to you, so that you could understand why wardecs are hurting this game. I get that it doesn’t fit your narrative, the result is something you don’t want and you are futilely fighting against this change. Normally, I would be on your side, wars are a fundamental part of EvE, and conflict is a good idea. But when they are hurting EvE by turning significant numbers of newer players away AS BRISC HAS BLATENTLY SAID, then they must be addressed. Ignoring the “facts” doesn’t make them any less true.
2 Likes
They don’t care, simple fix for simple minded players.
Look at all the special people shouting from the rooftops about the death of war decs, they’re absolutely clueless.
3 Likes
Nothing will change you are correct all it will do is increase people calling for more restrictions on war decs and by the look of it CCP will oblige. Instead of being able to war-dec corps with a structure in space, people will start screaming being immediately war-decced after building their first outpost/station etc etc, then the calls will be for CCP to nerf war decs to you can only war dec corps with multiple structures in space etc etc. The mechanic is simply broken but this slippery road is not one i’m comfortable with either.
I have multiple one man corps running out of empire stations, I shall continue with what I am doing which is taking a break from the actual game even though i’m plexed up until next month, all subs cancelled at this time.
To be fair, anyone can see data and have different opinions. Also can’t be surprised from a guy who said “I’ve missions in high sec for 10 years” to have a bias opinion and request war dec removal.
Did you notice no one else requested the removal of decs?
CCP stated themselves in the meeting that data shows new players actually aren’t effected by wars or do we only choose facts that agree with our opinions?
1 Like
No it means that corps with structures have more players to kill.
At Fanfest 2015 CCP thought the same thing and told everyone it was exactly the opposite of what they expected. Go Google it.
1 Like
That was 2015. now is 2018. and CCP have new owner and now must start to produce proffit…
Bye bye easy living in Island …
PA is in charge now.
This is a bad change. So much uncertainty. I am solely industrial and even I think this is wrong. Where’s the fun? Millenial pacifier spitters are in charge now? Yes I like my super tanky procurers but wtf? I want everyone to enjoy this game! Get lost back to whatever rainbowland you came from.
Looks at Black Desert Online guild war mechanics
Think you might be in for a surprise in the future…
1 Like
Code has a fortizar, yeah.
2 Likes
My steam account said: YOU’VE PLAYED: 1440 hours - for BDO and nothing from PA could not suprise me, I want to tell that CCP will be very suprised with their new bosses !
Why: CCP has favored only one group of players on the expense of profits and the development of the game. PA first of all, it wants to develop the game and attract as many new players as possible, even at the expense of so far privileged groups in new Eden.
And what does this has to do with retention rate?
No, I know he said player activity but before he said corp activity like the CSM meeting minutes. This has nothing to do with my agenda or whatsoever. I don’t even do wardecs, i’m most of the time on the receiving end.
I really wonder if this is so clear why don’t we see any numbers? Until then everyone claiming that there is a retention problem is talking out of his ass and can’t read or understand the CSM minutes.
That’s the joke dude. No one actually defends their structure. Since Citadels were released I think I’ve seen 5 actual fights over a structure… and we take lots of structure jobs.
Yes. Industrialists. What’s your point?
If you are an industrialist then you probably have a structure to be competitive. I on the other hand have none. Do you see the catch?
2 Likes