People mix up security from diplomacy and encryption used for that diplomacy and how it is potentially applied wrongfully from parties who are not diplomatic, working against that diplomacy.
Notice, here,
that I didnāt use the term democracy, which is another concept, even though related in some ways.
The reason it is diplomacy is related to the war.
No peace would exist currently without that encryption, diplomacy, and, ambassadors working for that peace.
We would be in conflict, and, what needs to be protected by encryption would be possible to be intercepted by undiplomatic parties seeking to make the diplomacy seem to be undiplomatic and criminal and sick and so on.
That is why , when encryption is traded, which value is really not for trade, but, rather for other reasons, such as security, and peace, it can end up in the wrong hands.
Also, to not pay tax on it aggravates this, and yes, can start a war.
So, yes, while encryption is good and used for computer program, which computer language use a form of encryption to interact with the processor, which every company uses, and while hardware also uses encryption to interact with other systems as well,
the stress level applied to it from parties which are against that global peace with the UN and the related rights to program and safeguard those programs and intellectual property as right to be inventory for data storage and intellectual property and run in RAM, and processor, including Crypto-currency, and ,
the stress level applied to it from parties which are for that global peace, with the UN and the related rights to program and safeguard
those programs and intellectual property as right to be inventory for data storage and intellectual property and run in RAM, and processor,
including Crypto-currency,
if it is used bad,
it is a weapon against that diplomacy.
It is also an act of war.
