delll…
Yeah that might be the case of course, but that kind of leads into the point of how about a little feedback? Like, we are ok with the goose, don’t like the colors. Or, we are good with the colors, no more animals. Or, nope it’s all wrong. Then at least you know where to go. When you have like 5 different subjective rules that cover a lot of different things, it’s hard to focus in on what they are really looking for.
1 Like
It’s not hard to discern that this person submitted a bunch of ugly, gaudy, cartoony logos. CCP has better things to do than point out the obvious. Those logos were terribly designed, and whoever made them should probably just disband their alliance.
I bet you would design them one for 1bill
1 Like
Githy is finally starting to understand!
1 Like
Wonderful🙀
Btw is that you on the launcher page of eve , the 50% off omega ad
1 Like
You too? Amazing ad for sure!
It can be depressing having a logo rejected for the reason that it needs to look “futuristic and dystopian”, while you’re looking at accepted logo’s such as Goons, which looks like a cartoon from the 60’s.
There can be a double standard clearly. I do understand however, ccp has the right to direct what they want for all “Future” logo’s, even though a lot of kiddie cartoons were accepted in the past.
Now when are we going to get some T3 weapons?
2 Likes
Yup, most of those have existed since a time where things were more relaxed when it came to logos, these days they need to be a little more picky with what they accept, which imo is fine, mine was under the more restrictive rules but it came out just fine imo
1 Like
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.