“Computer input” and “API” are two completely different things and mutually exclusive.
You can’t teach me. You don’t even know what you are talking about.
You are an ant trying to teach a fish how to swim. And you are telling me I’m doing it bad. That amount of stupidity…
Yes you do.
Otherwise your affirmation on the topic is just useless waste of time.
You can accept a specific contract providing you are ATK and clic on “accept” in the game.
There is no movement of assets in the game from the API by design. So anything that implies a movement of assets requires an ingame action.
That’s mandatory from the EULA that states that you can’t use a 3rd party program to acquire ingame resources at an accrued rate. If the ESI would allow to automatically transfer/move assets, then you could be banned for using it.
You may not use your own or any third-party software, macros or other stored rapid keystrokes or other patterns of play that facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status at an accelerated rate when compared with ordinary Game play.
And no, the Eve portal is provided by CCP so is not a 3rd party program and therefore can be used to acquire plex or isks.
Well, then you must be some kind of Jedi, if you are programming computer without using API. Think about programming language, which is actually telling computer what to do. first, you say print - an instruction which tell computer what to do then you say (“I’m not an idiot, I’m just stupid”) which is an input in know to computer Application Programming interface so it, the computer, has an idea what to do. If you would say just “He’s stupid” without print, it will not work. And you know why? Because that’s not written in computer’s know language, which is another interface, application programming interface. I know computer science is hard to understand, but when you learn to not argue with computer about what it is, and what it is not, then you might use proficiently.
And if you happen to be using some kind if REPL to program your application (which is set of know to computer instructions), you might sometimes, get away without using print, so you might see that you. are not idiot, you’re just stupid written out to standard output.
And you try to tell me that if CCP would change API, to allow you to create and accept contracts, I couldnt’ use because they will forget to change EULA part § something § something. Because that’s against rules they actually create, and they can’t change the rules they create. Bravo!
Then how I use it? Maybe I do not know something… Because I use an API all the time to program my computer. I don’t know, maybe you prefer other things.
Unrelated. API is neither related to you, nor to your computer.
Learn to read.
No you don’t. You re not programming your computer, never.
The only people that are programing your computer are those : Foundry model - Wikipedia
they do create physical program . Still they don’t use your own computer API… because this does not exist.
I think we’re talking about two different things. I am reffering to application programming interface. The application which is the subject is EVE Online. It offers basic programming interface know as EVE Swagger Iterface. I’m asking for extending it’s capabilities by means of creating new endpoints, exactly POST endpoints to Wallet and Contracts that would enable creating and accepting contracts and transferring ISK from Wallet.
You are insulting me, because you claim yourself to be:
That sentence looks backwards. You use your computer to program an API. You use an API to connect two programs together and interact between them. The API may pass instructions between program A and program B, but I don’t think that would qualify as ‘programming’ the computer that is operating program B.
Yes his whole posts looks backwards, like that times he claims that computers are more intelligent, then he says that they are stupid, then again he accuses me of claiming I am more intelligent than a computer.
He has no idea what is an API, and uses it like “interface”.
Fun fact, when I saw the post I thought you were him and started to think “OMG he realized he was wrong ! Nice !” But then I realize you are two different accounts. #losthope
It would not since you are not programing your computer but the program B.
The set of instruction you create through programing is not for your computer. It’s for a target architecture/environment.
Unless of course you are making an OS for your own specific solded chip (eg arduino). But then again you make a program for specs, then this program is pushed in the ROM of the chip, you are not making per se your own chip, so not sure.
Can’t you read? Beacause thinking is not your better side. Keep repeating this to yourself until you finally get it and maybe then you could change it. Until then I will keep repating what I have to say.
Can you, CCP not @Anderson_Geten make more POST API endpoints to make EVE Online more interesting to players that like to use programming language of their choice using your OpenAPI;
The game itself is not fun when you’re investing into it time and money because there are no other means to be better at it and all you can do is join some corporation that offer exactly the same as any other corporation - blowing up unaware rookie ships that are tackled in security space < 0.5;
No I can’t. Just like you can’t read the article I linked that tells you what an API actually is.
No they can’t. They have already like a hundred bugs in the ESI. Some have been present since the beginning. They also removed BM path and did not add more recent features like hypernet(good thing) or weathers. And also there are still issues in the game, and they still need to add content, create more graphical assets, try new hardware, refactor the POS code once and for all. And then rebalance the game, add new yearly event, what else …
Though possible, it’s very unlikely they would even care about your idea.
stupidity again.
NOT playing the game would not make it funnier.
You are the one making your fun. Don’t complain that your fun is bad.
I’m not a computer techy kind of person, im more of a human anatomy professor… But damn normally I among others argue with Andersen over mechanics in game and such, but dude, you lost this argument plainly with andersen. This will open up a can of worms CCP obviously doesn’t want opened when referring to the EULA and gaining items at an accelerated rate. Whose to say that if you did manage to pull something like this off, that you wouldn’t somehow restrict it so only certain people could attain items and such more so than others??
Not all innovation is progress. New is not better. More out-of-game interfaces with actual gameplay functions is more opportunities for botting and abuse, which are already areas CCP struggles to effectively manage. Unless and until they actually get on top of those issues, this would be a bad change because of said abuse.
Putting aside the idiocy of arguing what an API is and the stupidity of asking what to do about a 1H delay that doesn’t exist on the ESI, I don’t think this is a great idea.
I get wanting to be more engaged in an area of play that is of personal interest, but I could think of 20-30 features that would have broader appeal than this one.
I don’t think CCP will implement it anyway, but a -1 from me.