In the third video, could this be a pilot in a Charon jumping through a gate in Niarja (assuming it’s indeed Niarja), with the sun in the background and a nebula above the Charon?
In the last second on the left panel there is also a brief text that looks like:
?FACE
?EN
1.0
One (or some) letter seem to be cut off by the left panel border.
It remains to understand the meanings that are given in the messages. They are not just given
As others have said, these last few intercepts have certainly been observational survey information disseminated among the cladeflow, general looking-around by the trigs into our own space.
Although the line is not straight, I wouldn’t discount the idea that it is pointing somewhere completely. The EVE constellation is in that general direction.
Well, the problem there is: Gamis isn’t the middle system. So it’s not a line. It’s two different lines, one from Hator to Gamis, one from Hatori to Niarja. In nearly direct opposition.
Kinda like you’d get from any group of 3 if you don’t close the triangle.
The “transmission protocol” being used here may or may not be sequential. The order that we receive the videos is not necessarily the order of the surveys. Of course, lines can be drawn between any two points, and so it is risky to read too much into three dots.
It does seem reasonable to believe that the Triglavians are interested in stars, however. I wonder what the classification of the star in the abyssal system (if it is in fact one system) might be.
I think there’s one thing we can do with these dots- lay out an AoI (Area of Influence). If we know the Triglavians can observe these three points, it stands to reason, pending further information, they can observe all points in between. Could whoever’s doing the map “close the triangle” as Arrendis said?
For each “planet”, they gave a characteristic. And everyone here is ignored. This is a big mistake.
Niarja - GLORY, STRONG, HIGH STABLE
Hatori - FLAME, FAINT, NEGLIGIBLE
Gamis - RESTFUL, MEDIUM, WEAK STABLE
What does this mean? I dont know…
Those descriptors appear to be on the star. The strong/faint/medium is presumably hydrogen line analysis. The porevitium is-- hm. Still not sure there.
The “GalNet” citation may be a bit off, but the Triglavian surveys do appear to place particular importance on stars. Several fields relate to stellar classification, and that list appears to include “immanence” - a fuzzy mystical mythological quality (at least in contrast to luminosity and spectrum).
I don’t imagine the Triglavians literally worship stars as gods. But Glory, Flame, and Restful may be archetypes in a belief system that helps them identify useful features of this or that star. Habitation zones, energy output, or somesuch. But the power of myth, as it were, is to be pretty much anything.
Poked the button a little quickly…
With respect to the non-mythological qualities, I think your connection between “faint/negligible”, “medium/weak stable”, “strong/high stable” is a pretty solid observation.
I don’t know all the juicy details of what astronomers use The Hydrogen Line for - but it is Kind Of A Big Deal for measuring the Universe.
I think it simply refers to color, the Flame sun was very flame-y etc.
If we get another Flame, and it is also a K-type star, then that may well be it.
Given that the first star is a red K-star, the second one a white dwarf, and the third one a blue A-star, I could imagine that “IMMANENCE” might describe the star’s “immanent” intensity of nuclear fusion - slowly burning like a flame in K stars, dead and restful in white dwarfs, intense and glorious in A stars.
My assumptions on the other parameters are:
THERMOKINESIS -> Surface Temperature
BELO-CHERNO SCALE -> Luminosity
IMMANENCE -> Intensity of Nuclear Fusion
PROTIUM TRANSITION -> Intensity of Hydrogen Spectral Lines
POREVITIUM TRACE -> ???
LIMINAL BOUNDARY -> Radius
PROFOUND MATTER -> Metallicity, i.e. abundance of elements heavier than Helium
No clue what “POREVITIUM TRACE” might be, but I’m curious if there are stars where it’s classified as “…UNSTABLE”
The relationship that Formosus noticed between the hydrogen lines and Porevitium Trace looks pretty reasonable to me.
K-type lines are weak because the star’s hydrogen is not experiencing a lot of electron movement. The lines are also weak in very hot stars, because the electrons are all gone. The lines are strong in the “just the right temperature” stars.
Can you think of anything else that is stable for “just the right temperature” stars?
Hatori:
A bright orange star that is relatively cool but stable, being of a class that typically runs a fusion process on the main-sequence for as long as 30 billion years. Planetary systems containing an abundance of heavier metals and relatively complex molecular products have been noted as present around such stars.
These stable stars, emitting relatively gentle levels of ultraviolet radiation, are common targets for scientific expeditions looking for life or colonization survey teams seeking viable planets within their comfortable habitable zones.
Gamis:
This small white star is largely made up of degenerate matter and is slowly cooling, having ceased thermonuclear fusion after exhausting its fuel. The temperature of these stars is generally uniform through the body due to the excellent thermal conduction of degenerate electrons making up the bulk of their mass.
High surface gravity leads to separation and purification of elements in these stars such that, while generally composed mostly of carbon and oxygen, the atmosphere is rich in lighter elements.
I have a small hypothesis. Is there a star next to Hatori that could become a supernova? Next - 6.6ае
As with the explosion of the star wormholes opened. Why not repeat?
And these reports - search for a similar star.
Planets don’t do that…
I meant the stars.
There was nothing particularly unusual in the Hatori system visible to us - or at least nothing obviously unusual. Hatori’s star is much too small for a natural supernova, and there were no precursor objects (again visible) orbiting the star.
Hatori was scoured pretty comprehensively after the last Semiosis intercept, too…
