Some are hard to price up, so willing to work with you on some.
If you think I have some wrong prices, show me how and we can discuss.
Bowhead 8/14 – 8b?
Bowhead 8/14 – 8b?
Megathron 10/14 – 3b
Megathron 10/14 – 3b
Naglfar 9/14 – 5b
Archon 9/10 – 4b
Astrahus Blueprint 9/14 – 10b?
Astrahus Blueprint 9/14– 10b?
Orca 9/16 – 2b
Got happy when I saw “High End”
I did too 
. Id buy a megathron for 2 bil if you’re interested
sorry but I am not giving it away. 3b would make this the cheapest on contracts.
High end?
yes, expensive. They are not a cruiser BPO for sure.
Yes. I am sad I cannot afford such incredible pieces. One day I will be wealthy maybe. 
GL with your sale.
Although EVE technically doesn’t use the term ‘high end’ to refer to blueprints in the game, tech 1 subcap, freighter, carrier BPOs are definitely not ‘high end’, no matter their ME/TE or cost. Tech 2 hull BPs would probably fall under ‘high end’. But the term is rather useless and doesn’t specify anything in the game.
3b isn’t a high cost in the game either on the blueprint market. Just because you label it ‘expensive’ doesn’t make it so. The 0.001 - 10b range for blueprints is pretty commonplace and ‘very low’ to ‘low end’. So, yeah, funny term to use for a bunch of subcap BPOs, and anything below supercarrier/faction caps.
So I get It. You’re uber rich and this is not high end/expensive to you.
I can hardly call it cheap BPO. To me they are expensive and to many I know.
Seems to be all you folks have is issue with my title and none have offered what they think better.
Simply BPO for sale is too generic I think.
So, the feedback is NOT to call it high end. What to call it?
Maybe something a little more descriptive would be helpful, such as “Assorted Battleship/ Cap / structure BPOs.” No one is trying to dunk on you here. Hope that helps
thanks for some constructive feedback.
bum bump