Some are hard to price up, so willing to work with you on some.
If you think I have some wrong prices, show me how and we can discuss.
Bowhead 8/14 – 8b?
Bowhead 8/14 – 8b?
Megathron 10/14 – 3b
Megathron 10/14 – 3b
Naglfar 9/14 – 5b
Archon 9/10 – 4b
Astrahus Blueprint 9/14 – 10b?
Astrahus Blueprint 9/14– 10b?
Orca 9/16 – 2b
Got happy when I saw “High End”
I did too 
. Id buy a megathron for 2 bil if you’re interested
sorry but I am not giving it away. 3b would make this the cheapest on contracts.
High end?
yes, expensive. They are not a cruiser BPO for sure.
Yes. I am sad I cannot afford such incredible pieces. One day I will be wealthy maybe. 
GL with your sale.
Although EVE technically doesn’t use the term ‘high end’ to refer to blueprints in the game, tech 1 subcap, freighter, carrier BPOs are definitely not ‘high end’, no matter their ME/TE or cost. Tech 2 hull BPs would probably fall under ‘high end’. But the term is rather useless and doesn’t specify anything in the game.
3b isn’t a high cost in the game either on the blueprint market. Just because you label it ‘expensive’ doesn’t make it so. The 0.001 - 10b range for blueprints is pretty commonplace and ‘very low’ to ‘low end’. So, yeah, funny term to use for a bunch of subcap BPOs, and anything below supercarrier/faction caps.
So I get It. You’re uber rich and this is not high end/expensive to you.
I can hardly call it cheap BPO. To me they are expensive and to many I know.
Seems to be all you folks have is issue with my title and none have offered what they think better.
Simply BPO for sale is too generic I think.
So, the feedback is NOT to call it high end. What to call it?
Maybe something a little more descriptive would be helpful, such as “Assorted Battleship/ Cap / structure BPOs.” No one is trying to dunk on you here. Hope that helps
thanks for some constructive feedback.
bum bump
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.