Im not steering anything
Im just digging/drilling directly downwards to the core.
With terrible bait.
1 Like
Im not baiting at all.
Just drilling down to the truth of this, through years of layers of bull****.
Trolling more like
You totally lost my respect with this post
Because he and I already did. What you have to think about is outcome, often the result of changes don’t go as you expect for various reasons, @Bjorn_Tyrson did a very good job on explaining why your expected outcome might not materialise, and you ignored it. At this point I think I am out of here, because it is a complete waste of my time.
If stating, based on observation, that Nullbears dont want systemic safety/security removed is trolling/baiting, well, you are wrong.
Its a flat fact, demonstrated by yourselves above.
You dont want Delayed Local, no Asset Safety, no Insurance and no Watchlist, cos it creates more risk for you while you farm EVEs greatest wealth.
Yeah, you are. No insurance, no asset safety, delayed local, … If that’s not bait then what is?
I think we should remove the gates too and all structures call it the ‘‘Salvos’’ expansion.
All nullsec is now shattered systems.
That you dont want it, cos you like it safe/comfy as is, doesnt make it baiting or trolling.
Show me the people who want it.
Show us the out cries for such changes on reddit
That would be rather interesting, would players be able to make their own gates in that suggestion, and they would obviously be structures that can be destroyed. Would make the game a lot more interesting, but all that scanning for WH’s would set my teeth on edge, I left Stain because of that…
Me, and the others that want to come in and stomp your sandcastles in your privileged corner of the sandbox, as protected now by systemic safety/security mechanics that have no reason to exist in Player NS.
You and the highsec crowd that are too scared of the first gate leading to lowsec?
What are you going to stomp?
What are you afraid of?
Cant you function with Delayed Local, no Asset Safety, no Insurance and limited Watchlist?
Does that make you **** your pants?
Are you afraid of risk in EVEs most lucrative sector?
Who exactly?
The thousands of others that will descend on your complacent, “safe”, Nullbear butts to slap you around for complacency.
Look what happened when Immediate Local failed in NS due to chat bug. Players stormed in to wreck nullbears, and the rest of nullbears hid for the duration.
You fear more risk, and want the same Local, Asset Safety, Insurance as HS, though HS is the polar opposite with far less reward.
Ok, I still don’t know who you’re talking about, but may that as it be do I still need to ask how exactly you’re going to do this?
See, I live in high-sec, but even I can understand that if I was to go with an army into null-sec and try to stomp out someone’s castle, then I will also get no insurance payout. And if I want to put a foot into the door then I need some structure of my own, and without asset safety will I be equally screwed.
So you’ll need to explain this in a bit more detail how your suggestions would make someone like me, who is risk averse and knows it, believe to stand a chance when it only gets harder for all of us.
3 Likes
These guys are never going to agree.
They like farming, with as little risk as possible, in EVEs most lucrative sector.
These Nullbears are 100x worse than HSbears.
Excuse me? Is this the answer to my question?