There were a lot of accounts created just recently!!
they havent made the right changes imo.
Eve is in big trouble and small patches would not save it. Eve need big and bold changest, but āBrave Vikingsā from CCP are in fact scared chickens ā¦ 
Ok so this isnāt exactly an answer to your question, butā¦
I was having a discussion at Fanfest either just before or just after Citadels were introduced with a game dev. This turned into an argument when I pointed out that they risked alienating small groups and solo players who couldnāt afford to run the new structure and who didnāt want it to turn into a full time job mining ice for the fuel. Not just that but putting a big fat target in space that they couldnāt defend.
His answer?
I donāt care how many leave, we can always get more playersā¦
That attitude to the player base hasnāt exactly worked out has it? In fact itās his attitude that night that has slowly taken away my will to keep playing.
3 Likes
Well no, but this isnāt the first time Iām hearing this eitherā¦ WH peeps when the Mass/Agility changes to HIC bubbles came in as a good e.g.
But just because I agree with the statement doesnāt mean Iām not going to askā¦ Can I have your stuff?
Regards,
Cypr3ss.
1 Like
All my stuff apart from an Orca and the few ships we were given along with all my BPOās was sold and given away a while ago.
Canāt fault you for asking though 
1 Like
Iāll have the orca, I need one :p.
Iām not disagreeing that the attitude around changes hasnāt always been the best, even if I think most of these changes were needed. (Iām also thinking we needed asymmetric options for the defender around maintaining pve and therefore being in space as targets for all that time).
The same change but with a far more apologetic attitude would have been better.
the whole citadel thing was a huge mistake. They are cheap enough to be spam for large groups. They are unfun to kill and drop nothing of significance (outside of wh). Sure on occasion they may generate fights, but in my experience, the vast majority are undefended because its just not worth the effort, when they die throw up a new one. There is nothing more morale crushing then grinding citadels to see new ones thrown up immediately. Sure POS had some of the same issues, but (1) damage wasnt throttled, (2) there was a chance something could drop, and (3) you were limited in where you could place them which meant that you could control placement by throwing up your own.
2 Likes
That is a really interesting observation, being able to control placement because POSās could only be placed at moons.
Restricting structure anchoring to moons could be a solution to our structure spam problems.
wait, a game developer for eve online said
??
Yes. I had an argument with him on the forums where he denied it.
At that point I got worried about a ban so just shut up.
Itās worked for 15 years
1 Like
But that party comes to The End, 
A new one is born every 4.3 seconds.
https://www.google.com/search?q=how+often+is+a+baby+born+on+earth&ie=&oe=
EVE IS DYING!
2 Likes
You should give me your stuff before it is lost! 
NECRROOOOO
Fyi @CCP_Falcon and @CCP_Masterplan
The assist mechanism in Eve now does not allow you to offer a assist without the defender being āopen to assistsā on the specific war.
This does not allow for us to offer our services very well within the current mechanic. This was not mentioned in any of the patch notes, or in the change discussions over the last few months.
Can this be fixed and put back to the way it was?
Not many people know in a war dec they can get support so they are unlikely to open up to assists. To close this off seems to limit what CCP was looking to achieve in the new War mechanic changes.
2 Likes
People not able to adapt, I love it. I love the new system!
Spam removed.
1 Like