EVE Online dev team is understaffed

Its CCP thinking - at least for China, for now.

And you just buy that ā€œthinkingā€ like a sheep.

Na, i detailed quite accurately why i think this would greatly benefit EU/NA aswell.

And without in need of slandering or personal attacks, like you do.

Just because something is permitted doesn’t mean you have to do it and ganking 3-months-old characters isn’t war, it’s a massacre. No honor in that.

Never said I didn’t like it.
I got blown up by CONCORD for attacking an Orca not two days ago so I too like to fight but I don’t want to totally control a system like a Scrooge and blow up anyone that happens to pass through.
Y’all went overboard with the ganking.
Don’t complain now.

I never complained about PvP or ganking so your vitriol isn’t aimed at the right person.

1 Like

I love gankers’ tears. :smiley: Moar please.

1 Like

It will divide the current EU/NA population, Tranquility will become even more inactive and its economy will tank as there is only so much time one person can put into one game session per day …
Let alone a game as complex as Eve …

And if you cant even bother to respond to arguments placed in response to yours and just avoiding them by focusing on the personal attacks instead, then yes, you are that kind of special snowflake demographic responsible for killing the spirit of Eve for its entire lifetime.

Personal attacks are well suited in that case. If you take them too personally, your problem, not mine.

It is not only the safety settings, the new galaxy layout they showed, the new and upcoming content they announced and especially the fresh start is what it makes it so appealing.

1 Like

Not only that but no one is saying you can’t play on both servers.
One day you might feel you want to fight and the next you want to PvE.
No biggie.

There was no ā€œHonorā€ concept in Eve’s rules, that’s you making that up entirely and forcing that misconception of the game on its public.

People like you have been around and doing this for pretty much as long as idiots have.

Can you think of any ways to counter that problem creatively instead of just complaining about it just now ?

… lol

…

You contradict yourself litterally in the same post.

Do you think before typing at all ?

You refuse to even remotely imagine the implications of having 2 separate universes, or maybe your brain can’t.

Either way, I dont give a f anymore.

Have fun snowflakes.

1 Like

Moar salt, please :smiley:

1 Like

All that because of some stupid leader board on a website.
Sad.

Wherever the Mentally Challenged chooses to look.

@Forum_Monkey
The like is for providing a source and translation, and not because I actually like any of those changes.

Well, it might have a better chance of working out over their. Don’t know. Not an expert on Chinese gaming culture and tastes. What I do know, however, is that differ from TQ players. For example, they are certainly more tolerant of P2W, and overwhelmingly supported Edencom during Invasions chapter 3, which might indicate an increased preference for stability.

Long story short, I can’t say with confidence that it won’t work over there. If it does, however, I hope that CCP understands that there are major differences when it comes to the tastes and values of Serenity and TQ players.

2 Likes

We will see how the new server and the new rulset they are testing and polishing will turn out in china.
Access is currently only handed out to specific players who need to apply for it, so they are very early in developement.

But all the ideas they have shown off so far look very appealing and one just has to applaud them for their boldness.

And i still can not get my head arround why your so against simply giving players freedom of choice and another option.

"YOU DONT LIKE GANKING YOU ARE NEVER ALLOWED TO PLAY EVE, NOT EVEN ON ANOTHER SERVER!!1!1! "

Just why, give people what they want, let them pick and choose - in the end you will have more customers and more money in the bank.

Moar salt, please :smiley:

This whole discussion reminds me about the doomsayers when WoW classic was announced…
or LOTRO legendary servers…
or Runescape 3 release…
or oldschool Runescape re-release…

ā€œsplitting playerbaseā€
ā€œnoone wants it!ā€
ā€œdead after 6 month!11!1ā€

in the end they all were success stories.

Wow Classic, a success ?

Yeah, for like, a year at most.

People realized their old-school nostalgia drug fix and now big majority already got bored and left.

New iterations of games never solve an inherent cultural problem at base:

That it’s ā€œbetter to do with newā€ than to ā€œthink with what you already haveā€.

The former is generally easier to consume than the latter, yes.

So successfull it set new twitch viewing records for months on end and so sucessfull they released BC classic and now just announced WOTLK classic release date, so yeah… pretty successfull indeed.

https://archive.esportsobserver.com/wow-classic-twitch-record/

Gankers like to think they are keeping economy from inevitable collapse, but reality is a little different.

zkill stats for June 22, Hi-sec losses:
Overall: 4.53t
NPC kills: 1.21t
Ganked: 308.7b

Said that, I have no clue how it will turns out in the end, but glad they are trying it on China first.

2 Likes