There goes your “rigor” and totally not playing word games again…
LOL, what? Are you saying it was working as intended at first and then someone decided it should work differently? Why would this appear under “Defect Fixes” in the patch notes then?
Yes, I did write “because” but not “reason why”.
Especially I did not write anything like “sole reason why”, which is the concept you actually are using in
You could learn more here if you actually wanted to learn something today.
Indeed.
Why not ? I just don’t get it, what’s so difficult for you to grasp in the concept of design bug ?
1 Like
OK, this is my last post about this issue here, just to have a laugh. There is no point in continuing beyond that.
You don’t remember the context in which you said that, do you?
So what was this other reason I missed? Clearly, it wasn’t the one I said was, since you replied saying I don’t get it, so what was it?
You didn’t read the relevant quote from the patch notes I posted, did you? Or if you did, you don’t see how that has to be a code bug and cannot be a design bug, do you?
Fixed a rare case, where delayed drone aggression could trigger a CONCORD response with green safety settings.
Yes I do.
Dunno what other reason you are talking about.
yes I can.
So far? Trig-invasion of HS was fun … lost some ships, earned some isk … risk vs. reward ok … BUT drifters in NS … no way. Utter garbage since high risk NO reward. I will stop paying you until this crab is fixed. And maybe get those braindead zombies who had the idea fired!
3 Likes
Yes, please do so. Don’t let it stay on words only!
3 Likes
The problem is, when you would quit eve you loose your citas to bots.
Where is the difference ? Drifters = Bots … no, I will pack my things and be gone … and no, noone can have my stuff.
4 Likes
When are you going to fix the Agent Finder that it shows agents according to their jump distance from you and scrap this stupid random order? I’m currently in a station with a certain agent but the Agency still shows 5 other results above this agent in the results list. Is this your idea of “discovery UI development”?
4 Likes
Can someone please tell CCP’s advertisement department that we are not completely challenged? Leave this “check this news item for” out of your ridiculously limited space for actual text in the launcher cards and put actual information there. We know that this is a news item or an advertisement, you don’t have to tell us. Least of all in incomplete sentences that don’t even appear complete in the full advertisement page.
1 Like
Realy CCP ? Who want this Invasion SHI… ???
I don’t pay real Money for so … 
1 Like
the coming of null sec losing local seems to me a bit unfair to pve players.
making it easier for pvp players to hunt down the pve players . i think this will drive more players away from the game. the only good thing i see from this is it will make bot players lose more ships and stuff as well .
3 Likes
what is CCP smoke? sorry if i don´t wan´t local, then i go and life in a Wormhole.
u can tell us u´r plan, to understand where we travel with this game.
3 Likes
Removal of Local will finally make botters at least some levels of vulnerable. I’d prefer to have Constellation and Regional chats for Low and Null. Local has always been too powerful a tool.
1 Like
Did it 3 times.
Let me know how many botters you find in Provi.
i hope EVE died now with the Drifters ! who should compensate for the losses of the normal player??? !!!
It would be strange if frigate could not haul few T1/T2 modules…
Actually, for everyone usnubbing there are a few people subbing back cause they unsubbed due to all the safety. And drifters will go away soon enough - or at least what they do and ho will change. Remember that first few week invasions didn’t have that much of reward - only salvage and some loot. Now we have conduits. Wouldn’t be surprised if similar things happened with drifters.
1 Like
Do you have any source for that?