It still has a motor to make the air hot.
Tell me you wish you was right without telling me you wish you was right. It is not a motor XD
1 Like
Clearly the result of fitting a turbo to that motor. Gas ovens are motorised too.
2 Likes
I can kill a Hulk with a single catalyst, and harvest delicious and nutritious miner tears. 
I was just thinking of a bag of hot air that was in France. No idea why.
2 Likes
First ever jet engine powered hot air balloon probably.
1 Like
Simple burner, but it is still an engine.
PS I have explained it enough to no longer bother, but do continue to be pedantic.
PPS YawnâŚ, I am a Toulouse sausage, I make Cassoulet taste so much nicer.
It isnât motorised though. An engine yes, but it is not motorised.
2 Likes
Im an engineer. A steam engine also is not motorised.
2 Likes
Some seriously silly comments here from gankers and their supportersâŚ
âAFKâ : Unless you previously worked for Stanford Research Institute and were hired by the CIA to do remote viewingâŚhow the heck do you know someone is AFK ? Or is there some product one can by in the Eve marketplace that provides amazing psychic powers ?
âLazyâ Miners : Just because someone has not tanked up does not make them âlazyâ. They may have worked out that the cost of fitting out a Venture, for example, with lots of shielding is just not worth it. Especially given that a Venture can return 2.5 times its original cost in ore in just one trip. Why spend 1m ISK on fitting out a 190K Venture with shielding. Even with a 40m ISK ProcurerâŚyou âcanâ get it up to 80K EHP pointsâŚbut that involves spending 70m ISK. Why spend almost 3 times the cost of the vessel on defence ? Itâs really a question of the vessel cost, return on ore, and frequency of ganking. I can see why some decide no armour or shields is the more cost effective option !
2 Likes
Yet another absurdly silly comment. Concord take out the gankers regardlesâŚit has nothing to do with whether the miner âfights backâ.
And the idea that a Procurer, for example, can beat off half a dozen heavily armed Catalysts before being destroyed, using just drones ( as there are no available turrets left for weapons ) is crazy. At best it might take out one Catalyst before Concord show up anyway or it is destroyed.
You keep pushing this false narrative. Read the posts back. No one is saying a lone proc can take 6 catas. If you had a mining fleet of orca/5 procs with actual tank and the right boosts? That changes the story.
Also the Halloween flag event applies to ganking as well 
Cause its PvP CCP has spoken.
You can take your L and go sit down now.
One of my many goals in New Eden is to kill Matard players while in Minmatar low sec space. They are all criminals. The easier to kill the better as well. I can do the lords work more efficiently for the betterment of the Empire.
Itâs a lot worse than that but one mustnât reveal all their cards.
Lost your way I see. CONCORD takes out all capsuleer aggressors in hi sec not just those aggressing miners. You say âonlyâ and you are wrong again. You chose the wrong reason CONCORD takes action and then you limited that choice to said wrong reason.
1 Like
Whatâs wrong with minmater low sec , just the same as other low sec space . If you want your empire to prosper you should work on cleaning Abhazon of the infestation there, making a nice fast trade route for players to use , was there this morning why scouting and watched three faction and T2 cruisers killing endless shuttles pods and new players . People need to work together and make life hard for people , especially if they kill without mercy as some do .
Btw what other systems got new Star gates added.
Thereâs plenty ill be doing, not just purging minmatar filth. Ill be practicing blops when i log on soon.
Anyway you are an anti ganker. Ive been whinging about that gate needing clearing for a while. Dont make me leave a 1 star review on Glassdoor now XD
1 Like
ROFL learn better reading comprehension my boy. Iâm well aware they donât only take out people attacking miners. Maybe re-read the whole conversation again? Embarrassing for you ROFL. Whose alt are you
Her stance is that ganking is actually not PvP because CONCORD is PVE. But people donât fight CONCORD. CONCORD is the consequence of PvP in high sec
You tried bro. I also maybe feel English isnât your first language? I can easily see how our vernacular confuses you. And if it is well, again youâve just demonstrated why our education system is so bad
1 Like
The person who keeps twisting this way and that ( as Hans points out above ) is you. You have a whole series of goal posts that get moved toâŚone minute someone makes statement A, then 15 posts later you are claiming ânobody made statement Aâ and making completely contradictory comments. That has been the entire substance of this thread.
As a matter of fact Gerard DID state that a lone Proc could take on gankers.
Its the gankers who cannot get their story togetherâŚone minute saying one thing and the next day saying something completely different.
Oh? Provide that proof son
And it isnât moving goal posts ROFL.
Also I like how you dodged. The Halloween event includes ganking. CCP classifies it as PvP. Cry more please
Your opinion is just that. An opinion The fact is, ganking is PvP. No matter what you try to spout otherwise.
Funny how you malign flat earthers, yet you are basically the EVE equivalent to one. Interesting huh?