Both.
1 Like
The Hypernet Relay is a simulation of a raffle.
Eve Online is a simulation of people killing each other.
Hmmm.
1 Like
Capsuleers are immortal…
This isn’t a kids game.
1 Like
Exactly. Not kids.
So in your above reply you either referred to a minor as a kid or you just replied a statement that has nothing to do with the post you replied to and quoted.
Either way the term kid is not relevant. The term minor is relevant and applies.
1 Like
https://pegi.info/what-do-the-labels-mean
PEGI 12
Video games that show violence of a slightly more graphic nature towards fantasy characters or non-realistic violence towards human-like characters would fall in this age category. Sexual innuendo or sexual posturing can be present, while any bad language in this category must be mild. Gambling as it is normally carried out in real life in casinos or gambling halls can also be present (e.g. card games that in real life would be played for money).
The term kid is relevant when that’s what I said.
So your reply to his post is completely irrelevant. Got it.
1 Like
Nope. It was completely relevant. This is not a children’s game. You can pull out all of the ratings you want, but in the end, this is not a game that appeals to the kind of children that you need to shield from gambling. The onus is on the parent to police what their kid is doing online, not the company.
Now you can go back to your regularly scheduled pedantry.
The age rating was not in reference to what is allowed in the age rating, it was about what age audience is allowed to play the game in reference to the post by @Sennett_Forrell
Gambling laws disagree and are blanket laws based on age not on a case by case basis and let parents decide either just like laws about alcohol and other such laws.
Jesus Christ. Read the rest of the thread, and stop with this nonsense.
You have no argument. Glad we both agree.
I’ve made my arguments a dozen times. This hyperlink isn’t running afoul of any gambling laws. That the game has some kind of gambling mechanic is not likely to result in any issues, and the people screaming “but the children” are wrong.
Like I said, read the rest of the thread.
I follow the thread more or less since the beginning and your excuses never were sensible to begin with that is why a lot of people disagree with you. No need to agree but disagreeing doesn’t equate being factual nor correct. But you’ve shown a few posts above and earlier too that you don’t care about being factual and just consider things not supporting your view as being pedantic and whatnot. There would be no such reaction by so many people if there was absolutely no reason behind it, you not recognizing it doesn’t mean anything.
1 Like
Ok boomer
That was easy.
Hope you are better at your lobbyist job than this because based on this you are terrible at producing a convincing argument, unless “namecalling” is your forté. 