Seems you also can’t differentiate between average amount and top peak amount or how to distinguish a specific time period. I’m referencing a 4 month time period from Dec 2009 to March 2010 with peak log in amounts over 50k.
A 3 month time period with peak log in amounts over 50k
An 8 month time period with peak log in amounts over 50k
A 9 month time period with peak log in amounts over 50k
A 5 month time period with peak log in amounts over 50k.
Next time try actually reading and comprehending what is written before you try to demean somebody. There’s a big difference between average log in amounts and peak log in amounts.
Of course we have had peaks and periods over the average. That is goes with an average since the average is that measure of central tendency that balances the observations.
Considering that the two posts that started this were talking about what we typically saw in terms of PCU…yeah averages.
OMG, what a spiteful little immature response, seriously dude, stop doing selective partial quoting and then portray it out of context.
The complete statement wasn’t presented as fact. Notice the bold word.
I could have sworn the last record breaking log in amount for concurrent users was back in 2009/10, I think it was Alliance Tournament 7 with supposedly close to 80,000 people online. Could be wrong but for some reason that’s what I remember.
Seriously, no one was ever talking about peek logs. That was only you trying to score some cheap points because you once again had no idea what people where talking about and now you get seriously mad because people point out your lies.
Yeah, I agree placing the slider at specific points will indeed make the average amount of log in numbers different. If I was to cherry pick a specific time period I can even get it to show over 50k average users online.
However it wasn’t about trying to find the highest average users online. My response was to a blanket statement saying that Eve Online has never even had half of 100k users online. I simply looked at the whole history and picked a time period that had the highest amount of concurrent users online.
I do try to validate my opinions where I can, but there are lots of opinions that are purely that. No veneer needed (and my opinions mean nothing more than anyone else’s).
a hell of a chore to click jump next gate. nah sorry mate you want auto to 0 and that’s not going to happen. so no need to remove it, just dont use it.
Dude, pull your head out. Pig used selective partial quoting to demean another forum user with a direct blanket statement that was presented as factual truth.
Funny thing is the overall context of Cracowiak’s reply was in agreement of keeping Autopilot in it’s current form. However Pig used selective partial quoting with a direct statement and did the same exact thing Cracowiak did, posted an incorrect statement.
Anyway, there is no specific classification between average or peak log-in amounts in Pig’s reply, just a firm direct statement that Eve Online has NEVER had a log in count of 50k or more users online. With no malice or condemnation, I simply posted what I thought was the top log-in number, not a statement of fact, and in that same reply I also posted a quote from CCP Explorer with an amount higher than 50k. Later I found the actual number was even higher than that quote from CCP Explorer.
However out of spite you and a few others are so hellbent on finding malice where there isn’t any have ended up turning this into a forum flame war. Good job on showing everybody who you are.
Funny thing about flame wars on these specific forums is that there’s always this one specific dude who can’t resist but jumping in, saying something stupid, escalating, and prolonging, even (especially) if the discussion has nothing to do with him. (Not you, scroll up.)
But yeah, this thread stopped being interesting or productive 200 posts ago. Why is it even still alive?
