Let’s make getting concorded cost 5000 evermarks per gank. This way the gankers will now have to go run dailies so they can keep ganking.
Why should people committing crimes go unpunished?
Make them pay for what they did.
2 Likes
Awesome! A Ganking thread. 
3 Likes
On the topic of Evermarks and ganking:
who else thinks that the decision of CCP to let players get rid of mining ships for Evermarks is a clear sign that not enough mining ships were taken out of the economy (i.e. destroyed) in this game?
2 Likes
It happens a lot, even in real life.
I guess we’re supposed to get used to it? 
Hell, I might get into the action myself.
I fully agree. In fact, double the Evermarks, I want to pay 10.000 of these everytime I attack someone in high security space. And I also should have to pay 1 PLEX everytime I undock, just because.
Make entering a ship a minigame, where I have to dodge guards and board my ship from within a secure hangar, metal gear style. I want to have to do this for every single character. And of course they should undock immediately, so I should have to constantly warp around with one half of my characters, while I board the ship with the remaining ones, until I am fully undocked.
Also add a CONCORD virus to my ships, so that there is always a random chance upon undocking that it will offline my weapons. And no I can’t dock back up.
In fact, ships in my hangar are too secure. Everytime a gank is performed, there should always be a significant chance that a few of them are simply stolen by CONCORD, cargo and modules included.
Yeah, I think that these would be a great idea. CCP, please implement these changes as soon as you can!!
With hasty regards
-James Fuchs
3 Likes
So what happens when the disposable alts run out of evermarks?
You start your own OF and ask for generous EM donations to support this lifestyle. In return, donors get juicy killmails.
Counterpoint: Why should people committing crimes go punished?
2 Likes
Instead of Evermarks, I think Gankers should have to buy a… (wait for it)… Ganking Permit.
2 Likes
That’s brilliant!
1 Like
how about making posting in jita local cost 5000 evemarks? I think that’s better
3 Likes
Interesting approach. My approach is a little different. Just disable safety red in hs for all accounts not just alpha accounts. They’ve already shown us it’s possible by doing it to alpha accounts.
But if your aim is to keep it in the game I say make it so it has an extremely heavy sp loss. People wanting to gank will either get far less of them because time to retrain skills or they will swipe a credit card and buy skillpoints. CCP wins that way.
Why should there be any restriction of ganking?
2 Likes
Because it’s a lazy knuckleheads playstyle that makes players quit.
4 Likes
1 Like
I have a ganking permit. It’s called logging in to a PvP game.
What we really need is for there to be a permit for people like AzothPrime to endlessly post ’ Can anyone spare me 100m ISK for a skillbook’ in Jita local. Scamming people in local should cost Evermarks.
moved to Player Features & Ideas
Removed multiple posts for the below reasons:
1. Specifically restricted conduct.
The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to courteous when disagreeing with others.
In order to maintain an environment where everyone is welcome and discussion flows freely, certain types of conduct are prohibited on the EVE Online forums. These are:
- Trolling
- Flaming
- Ranting
- Personal Attacks
- Harassment
- Doxxing
- Racism & Discrimination
- Hate Speech
- Sexism
- Spamming
- Bumping
- Off-Topic Posting
- Pyramid Quoting
- Rumor Mongering
- New Player Bashing
- Impersonation
- Advertising
1 Like