Here are two recent examples from the forums:
I strongly disagree. What is best for the game is creating new content with counter-play to keep veterans and new players alike interested in this old game. This will cause mass unsubscriptions and further alienate people (like myself) who have been playing this game for years.
Yes I get it that Rorqs and Supercaps are isk faucets and that is bad for the game, but I (and people smarter than I) could list 1000x different, non-lazy ways to make it more risky for PVE in null-sec and cyno/umbrellas…
This change is a scam.
And beacause it’s a scam i will react with all thing i have on my hand to answer to the scam (include asking reimburssement of all remaning sub time the day of you’re change).
You ask people to have 2 account to make what they was doing with 1 on the past.
You change rule to force they to buy you’re product to have SP in time for play.
Big group could adap not the problem.
Problem is the way you take. I see 3 option:
-You know you fail PA objective, so some CCP emplo…
I’ve also heard it from alliance mates. The bonuses are not a fake and the entire idea is at least plausible. As it is also falsifiable (for example the cutoff date might already be over), I think it’s sensible to ask CCP about it.