As a newb, he’s too ignorant and inexperienced to understand how much of a bad idea this is
Salt, I hereby demote you from newb to nub. Keep at it and I’ll take yet another letter away and you’ll be a ‘nb’. If I demote you again, you’ll be a… well, I’ll can’t just take away another letter because that would be racist, so I’ll have to think of something else.
You mean bomb singular, I suppose if there is a capsule or shuttle in the explosion, otherwise without an actual ship destroyed I don’t think it qualifies as a gank?
Xeux has so far been an active participant in both the “highly specific ways to improve EVE” and in the " " channels… she’s just framing things in a bad context just to troll me… doesn’t want to admit that she has become one of us… one of us… one of us… one of us…
I sat through a long lecture about how the combat interceptor should be fixed. My eyes glazed over when he started explaining that combat interceptors should not be combat craft.
So you want to bomb the Jita undock…not sure how well that would go for starters…
Not a bad cause…
Think i could have fun with that for a couple of weeks in the first month of overzealous bombing of 4-4… both building and selling bombers, and probably even participating myself.
but afterwards…idk, maybe but im leaning towards no.
Did I miss something? Are smartbombs being buffed in some way?
Regardless…I say we only allow bombs in places where bubbles are allowed. Either “deployable AoE yes” or “deployable AoE no”. “Deployable AoE so so”…well, squish just like grape.