You already conceded there was evidence when you said
There was also the additional evidence of command bursts and the specific differences between faction named modules.
So, there was an assertion and there was evidence provided…
Acknowledging the Interdictor changes and ignoring the other points is nut picking (its the weird cushion of cherry picking data).
So feel free to “nope” all you want. Its as effective of an argument as 28 years ago.
Going back to 2011’s levels of power tripping? T2 1600mm plate and a full rack of T2 Neutrons? Any cruiser does well with just a 800mm, any soloer will tell you these ships need buffs, but at their current state they are still formidable fleet ships, we’ll see blocs running unkillable proteus fleets again around new eden.
But no evidence on that assertion.
L2R
therefore : “nope”.
why the hell would you want to buff the loki.
Have my babies.
@CCP_Aurora thoughts on giving proteus a damp bonus?
Called it…
The Proteus Tech 3 Strategic Cruiser has received a small balance pass with the following changes: Augmented Plating Subsystem: 25% reduction in Armor Plate Mass Penalty
Its almost as if they want Gallente ships to be more maneuverable…
Caldari definitely shield resist.
Cause I have a toon that is 1hr 20mins from all 5’s for the Loki.
Then again, I’m too darn cheap to buy and fit one.
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.