Killboard says we are winning the battle of Uedama. I can understand why you no longer wish to bankroll the failures.
1 Like
Thanks for that quote.
And that one too.
This one kill is multiples of everything AG has managed to do, and that’s just one kill.
1 Like
There’s not even one AG in Uedama. Did you guys all just quit?
1 Like
All Hail the Queen, Princess Aiko Danuja, Heir of the Legacy of King James CCXV. May the stars sing her praise.
1 Like
Looks like he changed sides:
1 Like
Not been on a great deal over the last 4 day but seen a number of fail ganks myself and gankers messing there loot pick up .
Saying that never seen numbers like it before in Uedama they are really racking up the kills.
Null getting boring?
Might not be getting bounty pay out but come and get some loot and salvage, sure it’s good money for new player and what a site it to see these large fleet do there stuff
What was the payout on whoever got Connery?
Boring non-content. 
Much like your own posts, then? 
@Insidious_Sainthood fallen back to second place 
I’ll step it up
New Rule: This has been suggested from the start and now it’s time to implement it.
- If damage is equal to zero then, at my discretion based on ship type, number of pilots involved and weapon shown, I will decide if that particular pilot qualifies for a bounty payment
Total Bounties Paid: 51.9M
1 Like
Miner, you need to calm down and swear fealty to your saviourette, Princess Aiko!
Great CONCORD-whoring! Call me when you and your fellow miners stop a gank.
So you notice that it’s few and far between too? I know but they are trying at least and I would think that James would be happy about that. Anything to encourage them to fight right? Isn’t that part of the code?
Has this ever been suggested? This would actually be wrong. What matters is the presence of CONCORD (not faction police) on the kill, not the amount of damage dealt.
A kill with zero damage dealt but no CONCORD typically means the ganker was caught, usually jumping a gate, and is nearly always a good kill unless the ganker managed to kill something there before dying to facpo.
On the other hand, a damage dealing (not E-War) kill with CONCORD on it is always a bad kill, even if damage dealt was 99%, and regardless of whether the victim died or not.
The problematic cases are (1) E-War kills that appear to be damage dealing because some other weapon was also used and that is what the kill shows, and (2) E-War kills that did still make no difference for some reason, but might appear to be good just because the gank failed (e.g. 1-shot Tornados).
1 Like
Well, you’re not encouraging them to make a meaningful difference.