Actually, the reason it’s aimed at controlling Google, is because, when they will increase the price, such as costs for licensing, in the form of fees for management, either by the European Union legislation or other, this will help the competition to grow, because Google operations costs will be higher and the competition can then charge more.
Those legislation also are aware that the cie ordered to comply will maintain the monopoly nonetheless, and will show that it is the case, after the fact.
Other sanctions can be added as monopoly effect continues.
One of my ancestor actually had a monopoly granted for 1 year.
Not listening is a big bonus when listening is not possibly enough, and that it requires copyright registration, and video recording.
Also: this was a test so cars didn’t piled on the freeway and kids didn’t walked through the traffic at the parking lot, but it didn’t work better than the old system. Nonetheless, can someone spot any craze in driving in 700 children in 700 cars?
I think its because people fear other children will make fun of your children inside bus and make pranks, you know, pleb things. Also being chaufered around in car is comfortable.
According to the description, there are some buses, but children live scattered all around up to 15 miles away from school, some buses have a route starting at 6 AM (whereas school begins at 8 AM) and all in all most parents bring their chidlren on their way to work.
Bicycles aren’t an option because they would require a massive amount of bicyle lanes which would barely be justified as they wouldn’t even go to a town, essentially would link the middle of nowhere to another middle of nowhere for each single child (and what you do with those bicycle lanes when chidlren stop living in the house or stop going to school?). And walking on the road isn’t exaclty a sane option.
So esentially everyone pays the price for a) living scattered all over a place and b) having a single large school in the middle of nowhere.
Here in my neck of the woods we have similar problems with the mountains as there’s villages scattered all over the place… the solution we use is to make small schools, starting with sizes as small as just 10 or 12 children and 2 or 3 teachers, and each school has its own bus line linking several villages or farms. So instead of 1 school with 700 children, we might end with 15 schools for those same 700 children -and save a lot of traffic and driving on mountain roads. This, of course, is offset by large schools in urban areas served by public transportation and/or cycling and/or walking (there are some trial programs so younger children within 20 minutes of walking are gathered and escorted by volunteer parents).
Yes, probably living together would makea difference but… 'Murrrica, land of the free and the right to not have any neighbor closer than a gunshot away (or two).
As for videoschools, that might be a tad too extreme unless children live literally hundreds of kilometers away.
The distance doesnt matter, it would be actually as feasible to do it for childrens that are 100 meters away. Only thing is they have to get a good connection speed for sending video. And ISP have to be reliable. Reliability is even less important, someone could watch later the recorded streams.
