You came to that conclusion all by yourself? Congratulations. As I told the Heathen, now the Heretic, this isn’t a new issue.
1 Like
I just wanted to say, I finally added some whisky to my pod.
It was… Wild…
1 Like
Who are you calling a heretic?
I guess it takes one to know one.
3 Likes
Which would make the Theology Council inquisitors also heretics. A conundrum !
Yeah… I concede that my joke doesn’t work too well then after all.
1 Like
Hey, you, lady, don’t you dare to blame others in being dense with your inability to build a coherent and logical defense. It looks neither wise, nor smart. But, up to you, it’s your reputation, after all.
Now, speaking about being dense, it was said about objecting her participation in Trials, and it’s really surprising you were unable to catch such an easy concept. So, for someone of your abilities, I believe it would be wise of me to repeat it just one more time: if you want to rebel against “corruption”, you should have rebelled against her participation before the trials. But since you have rebelled after, it just means you have rebelled not against her participation and her pretending to take the throne, but against God’s Will.
Do you see that now? Or I need to phrase it ten more times differently so you would be able finally to comprehend it?
This is so surreal. A Caldari is arguing with a Purity of the Thronist about the Amarr Faith. Am I on drugs?
It will be hard to estimate the answer to this question. But usually, when people ask that, they have a tendency to take drugs and thus answer shall be skewed towards being positive.
Just because you can’t see something doesn’t mean it isn’t there.
1 Like
Don’t confuse your inability to show your point with others ability to see. There’s no use looking for a black cat in the dark room, especially when there’s no cat at all.
There is no use continuing this. Your intent is not to listen, only to reply.
Well yes, it is not a new issue. But your lot had 300 years to object to the presence of House Tash-Murkon, during Emperor Heideran’s reign, and at the succession of Emperor Doriam, and at the succession of Empress Jamyl, and yet it was only when they won, that your lot decided to actually do anything.
Closing the stable door after the horse has bolted ?
Your lot let the horse be fed, watered, groomed, and shod first.
At the risk of defending a zealot Mary, I find the idea that you cannot call out a wrong if it has not been called out previously stunningly stupid.
2 Likes
I agree that there’s no use in continuing this, but don’t you dare to claim what my intent is, since you’re clearly unable to understand that.
I was quite eager listening to you, but as we all can see now, you behave like I pulled down your pants in front of the crowd and you’re just unable to put them back, wriggling and hissing in reply. It doesn’t look like you could use any logic or bring in some scriptures, even trying to defend your position with either reasoning or dogmas, no, you was just like a crying child who can’t admit his own mistake.
Indeed there’s no use continuing this. I am sorry for poking that. Stick to your delusions if you insist.
1 Like
That wasn’t my point though.
My point was that if it was so wrong and against the Scriptures and all that, then in 300 years you’d think there’d have been a bit more resistance, instead of a tiny handful of sore Holders miffed at being outranked by an Udorian.
See, it isn’t explicitly denied by the scriptures, however it isn’t explicitly allowed either. To question the rise of a non-True Amarr bloodline house is technically within the law, from a purist point of view.
Where the nuance comes in is the tacit agreement of imperial institutions as well the theological council within the past 300 years would essentially mean that the rise of non- True Amarr house does not run counter to scriptures. To my knowledge, this question has not been taken on directly by the Council. It would be a fascinating case study.
Tash-Murkon are a True Amarr house, though, regardless of the mixed ancestry.
This is always such a ■■■■■■■ distraction, though. The problems with Catiz and Tash-Murkon have nothing to do with their racial background and everything to do with how dismissive they are of the faith.
Oh really? Then why do the lavatory cleaners bring up the ancestry thing at every opportunity?
The purity types and Samira have different objections.
1 Like