Touch a nerve did I.
The creation of a single entity is based on being able to compete with nullsec alliances when they come to hisec to close down the war, it is quite plainly stated by a number of people. Call them silly then.
PIRAT are actually smart players and their current leader is especially clever.
The cost of war decking larger entities went down, but I would agree that war decs at 100m are too expensive, in fact I thought 50m was too expensive too. Personally I would reduce the cost to about 20m
Blowing up an undefended structure is really easy, I can do that on my own. Blowing up a manned one is actually not that difficult and a small competent corp should be able to do it. No wonder mercs are in such a mess if they get beaten by unmanned forts.
PIRAT are smart able players, they don’t wallow in self pity over the past.
So what, you have to pick the targets that suit you.
Another layer of salt coming my way…
Did I say it was a good time for you or for Mo? Some people don’t mind doing it as a means to an end, I am in that group. I have the willpower to do it if I want to. That you two don’t is not my issue and to try to pin it back to oh it is boring is just lame.
When I was in the war dec discord and after I left it I was pushing for CCP to allow 3 war decs per entity without the need for any structures on the defenders side. Of course you are too unobservant to note that I did this and even to understand why. With the lack of remote RR this would be a good change that CCP could do now.
But of course you can just throw comments like deluded or troll at me.
I predict what happens, sometimes I get it right, some times I don’t, I expected that the war deckers would group up, I did not expect Marmite to fold into PIRAT. I expect that war deckers will break apart into smaller groups at some point in the future, but I expect PIRAT will maintain their main core. I hoped that they would all gang up and focus on one area leaving large areas of space free of war deckers.
So Soothsaying V sounds like a good skill to have.
Good you don’t debate very well in any case.