100% of my assets up to $250,000 per bank that I have assets in. The vast majority of people have nothing to worry about from bank failure.
of course only if there isnât also a government crisis
If the US government collapses then weâre living in a post-apocalypic hellscape where bitcoin wonât be worth anything either.
and i donât need to have faith neither in a bank nor in a government that my assets will not disappear and i will always have access to them.
No, you have worse: faith in software developers. Faith that some low-paid junior software developer didnât make a critical mistake in the rush to meet a deadline. Faith that never, under any circumstances, will any hack or bug ever occur that breaches your security because if one does you will instantly lose everything and there is no way to get it back.
you do that every time you make a payment in traditional system.
And that permission is always granted. In any scenario where the government denies permission to use my money they can also shut down bitcoin.
yeah, FOR THINGS THAT WERE LEGAL PRIOR TO THE BAN.
Guess what: none of those things will be available to buy with bitcoin. Legitimate business that arenât already facing so many serious felony charges that a few more years of prison time for dealing in illegal bitcoin doesnât scare them wonât accept bitcoin. Your local grocery store isnât going to risk fines and prison time to satisfy your fanatical devotion to bitcoin.
100% of my assets up to $250,000 per bank that I have assets in
if you have to amend âall my assetsâ with anything, then itâs not all your assets. donât be an idiot.
The vast majority of people have nothing to worry about from bank failure.
and the vast majority of people on earth have been screwed by that belief.
If the US government collapses
oh so you also think bitcoin can only be used by people in the US? how many idiotic beliefs do you keep in your head?
No, you have worse: faith in software developers
nope, none, just another one of your idiotic beliefs.
never, under any circumstances, will any hack or bug ever occur that breaches your security because if one does you will instantly lose everything and there is no way to get it back.
applies to any financial system.
And that permission is always granted
not having to care about whether permission will be granted is categorically better.
none of those things will be available to buy with bitcoin
thatâs just another one of your idiotic beliefs.
and the worst of them all is of course that you can suggest somebody is a child abuser because they disagree with you on the internet. pathetic.
$250,000 per bank. And the small percentage of people who have enough wealth to care about asset values over a few million dollars donât have their assets in currency of any kind. They have stocks, real estate, etc.
oh so you also think bitcoin can only be used by people in the US?
Repeat for every other civilized country. If your entire economy and government collapse youâre screwed anyway and bitcoin wonât save you.
nope, none, just another one of your idiotic beliefs.
Oh really? So tell me then, how do you know that the PC you enter your 12 words into doesnât have a keylogger that is about to log those words and use them to steal all of your bitcoin?
applies to any financial system.
No it doesnât. If thereâs a security breach at my bank any money I lose is refunded. If thereâs a bitcoin security breach any losses can not be recovered. Bitcoin relies on 100% perfect security because any failure is catastrophic, conventional banking relies on having good enough security that the bank still makes a profit even after they settle the occasional breach.
thatâs just another one of your idiotic beliefs.
Oh really? You honestly believe that legitimate grocery stores/gas stations/etc are going to risk fines and prison time to satisfy your fanatical devotion to bitcoin?
and the worst of them all is of course that you can suggest somebody is a child abuser because they disagree with you on the internet. pathetic.
$250,000 per bank. Repeat for every other civilized country.
again, something you stubbornly ignore: vast majority of people on earth were screwed by placing trust in such systems and are getting screwed at this very moment in pretty much every economy via instabilities, inflation and more. bitcoin is a hedge against all of that. itâs not a hard idea to grasp.
tell me then, how do you know that the PC you enter your 12 words into doesnât have a keylogger
your arguments are based on your ignorance which makes you look very dumb.
Bitcoin relies on 100% perfect security because any failure is catastrophic
again, just ignorance. there are ways to manage keys such that losing any one of them or even multiple keys does not prevent you from accessing your assets. and finally one can build the same banking and insurance services on top of bitcoin. youâre just clueless and canât think of how problems can be solved in multiple ways.
You honestly believe that legitimate grocery stores/gas stations/etc are going to risk fines and prison time to satisfy your fanatical devotion to bitcoin
weâve already been over this - your dumb hypotheticals of nazi fantasy land are irrelevant because all of the same questions can be asked about traditional financial system - people have been denied access to their assets, currencies have been declared illegal, currencies have collapsed and become worthless, none of this is some inherent bitcoin problem.
So, youâre not going to answer the question of how you know that your PC is secure without putting faith in software engineers. Your dishonesty is noted and your concession of defeat is accepted, fanboy.
youâre just clueless and canât think of how problems can be solved in multiple ways.
I can think of how problems can be solved in multiple ways. Unlike you I understand the technology and issues involved, and I donât start my solution process with the premise that any solution must include the object of my fanboy obsession. Those âmultiple waysâ to secure bitcoin end up making an awkward product with all of the problems of bitcoin and all of the problems that bitcoin is supposed to be solving.
there are ways to manage keys such that losing any one of them or even multiple keys does not prevent you from accessing your assets
Cool. Do you have any idea what happens when you have multiple possible keys, each stored in different places, that can unlock your bitcoin wallet?
(Hint: it makes the system much less secure.)
your dumb hypotheticals of nazi fantasy land
Thank you for reinforcing the fact that you are a delusional fanboy by equating banning bitcoin to Nazi atrocities.
your denial is pathetic as well:
What is pathetic is how you quote that sentence out of context, ignoring the part where you proudly declared your intent to use the businesses that accept bitcoin after bitcoin is (hypothetically) banned. The people who would accept bitcoin in that scenario are all drug dealers, child abusers, and assorted other felons. I donât know why you would want to deal with those people but youâve clearly stated that you would.
Now, if you would like to change your position and admit that you would not use bitcoin if it were banned then I will not push the issue any further. I will certainly accept that you have seen the error of your ways and understand the need to refrain from dealing with criminals even if it means that you are no longer able to spend your precious bitcoins.
youâre not going to answer the question of how you know that your PC is secure without putting faith in software engineers
you can just google. short answer is that you have a range of options from air gapped devices to hardware wallets to services that provide you with 2-factor auth signing transactions with multiple keys. the fact that you donât know those options exist just shows how ignorant you are on this topic.
Those âmultiple waysâ to secure bitcoin end up making an awkward product with all of the problems of bitcoin and all of the problems that bitcoin is supposed to be solving.
thatâs just your opinion of which you provided zero evidence.
Do you have any idea what happens when you have multiple possible keys, each stored in different places, that can unlock your bitcoin wallet? (Hint: it makes the system much less secure.)
again, if you donât know how something works - donât have strong opinions on it, makes you look dumb. multisignature schemes donât make anything less secure, they allow for more flexibility with security and you can stay as secure as you wish.
What is pathetic is how you quote that sentence out of context
i quoted the entire thing and i will continue quoting it to remind you how much of piece of â â â â you are for suggesting somebody is a child abuser simply because they disagree with you on the internet. youâre a piece of â â â â .
They donât do CVEs for those type of vulnerabilities
bitcoin tracks vulnerabilities in CVEs. if you are claiming there are vulnerabilities in bitcoin introduced by lightning network - then you must have CVEs. otherwise admit that you meant something different.
my position was - and still is - that wasting energy does not secure bitcoin
that conflicts with your previous statement that
Itâs a single aspect of security though. All itâs saying is that you need a lot of hardware to override the censenus. But thatâs not the only security needed.
so which one do you want to stick by?
Thatâs not MFA though. Thatâs you being able to require multiple passwords. MFA requires varied authentication types too
you really have no idea what youâre talking about. second key can be in a hardware wallet, which would make it a valid 2FA scheme, or it can be sent to a third party that will do a more usual 2FA with me through mobile phone push notifications or SMS. i absolutely can have as many MFA options as i want.
Bitcoin is a ponzi scheme, there to be a way for people to gamble on a speculative asset. Itâs nto even remotely close to be ing a financial system
well thatâs just your opinion. my opinion is that it is an alternative to traditional financial system.
You need to pick a position and stick to it. You bounce back and forth a lot.
quote me where i said bitcoin is going to replace fiat currencies or admit that youâre prejudiced.
you have to have faith in a group of developers and a bunch of randoms you hope will be running the hardware for eternity
itâs not a matter of faith. code is out there, the system is decentralized, the system exists as long as there are people interested in itâs existence.
But things that were legal wonât be being sold for cypto because theyâd still want to run their business without being shut down
you canât know for sure, youâre just speculating. just as iâm speculating that businesses will still serve customers even under oppressive regime.
Noone has accused you of that though. What Merin has done is point out one of the common uses of bitcoin which you would be directly supporting if you continued to use bitcoin in the event of a ban.
âchild abusers will be happy of your patronageâ - whatâs that if not suggestion that iâm open to supporting (and therefore participating) in child abuse? itâs fine to have disagreement about stuff on the internet, but suggestions like that is the shittiest form of verbal abuse and you trying to rationalize it simply because somebody has opinions similar to yours is not a smart move. Merin is a piece of â â â â .
There is no chance whatsoever that you own enough assets to be over the insurance limits
see, this is not about whether i have assets or not. itâs a categorical thing - if at any point in time i have to ask myself âis my wealth over some limit that i need to start worrying and doing something to make sure they are safeâ - itâs categorically worse than not having to ask yourself that question ever. it doesnât matter how much bitcoin you have - bitcoin is as safe for people having 1BTC as it is for people having 1,000,000BTC.
Youâre the one who thinks that thereâs just one solution for everything
again, quote me saying that or stop making stuff up.
It is a funny situation. Iâm sure the central governments know that these âcybercurrenciesâ (or whatever they are called) are Ponzi schemes, but they donât want to ban them outright because that would make it look like governments have something to be afraid of. Perhaps they rationalize it like they do with most of finance: sophisticated investors should be allowed to do whatever they want with their fun money.
So far, nobody seems to be terribly vulnerable to a cybercurrency collapse. People will just lose all their money, then throw up their hands afterwards and say something like: âWho could have seen that coming?â It is mostly the relatively well-to-do that are investing in it, not desperate people. Gambling is legal if you are rich and pay your taxes.
I donât think the government wants to meddle in the investment casino, because they donât want to be blamed. Just about every investment class is a Ponzi scheme at this point.
As an example, we all know that Gamestopâs stock value is trending towards zero, but people are still allowed to own and trade that. So, how are cyber-Ponzi tokens any different? In fact, Gamestop will probably cease to exist long before people give up on bitcoin.
The Exchange and the Transaction system are not the same but are or can be similar in some ways.
The Exodus Exchange Wallet acts as a Wallet, which wallet is used to store Cryptocurrency, which Cryptocurrency can be ported, literally from systems to systems, via Electronic Data Transaction Systems.
â
So,
the Wallet system itself and themselves,
as,
more than one companies offer Cryptocurrency Wallet(s),
which Cryptocurrency Wallet(s) Services are not the same as other wallets,
which allows users to transfer their currencies between them.
Additionally,
those wallet data,
and their related security related data,
can be used to pay for items with other systems accepting their currency.
â
Exodus also offers Exchange of Currency from one type to another.
They however do charge money for that ,
which money for that is to pay for ,
and cover for the service costs of ,
the processing of the transaction ,
of the transfer of one currency into another .
Additionally, it also includes processing costs,
as well as upgrade costs for those hardware and software systems to upgrade their structure,
since,
once the market grows,
the demand on the hardware and software system also grows,
which,
doesnât decrease the cost,
but,
rather,
increases it,
for a single service entity,
business service entity,
which,
in this case,
has to pay for it.
So, either they charge the user on a transaction basis,
or, they offer them a flat rate for it.
Like, one user x at transaction number w gets charged for a $15,000 system upgrade including a new computer and software with licenses, insurance, transport, and what not.
â
So, Exchange to exchange crypto in crypto, and/or money (cash or credit),
and 2. Also a Wallet service, which is 2 service,
and 3. Also offers a service to actually buy the Bitcoins from them,
which is a Transaction Service.
â
The first transaction service that I bought $5 from did fraud to me,
and now,
I find that the 2 other companies also do,
and,
on top of that,
write me that they are sorry because they are too busy,
and too overloaded with work,
so that,
they could not answer me before,
or,
their encryption consists of ,
not answering before,
since other entities also do that.
Furthermore,
since courts also engage in this kind of diversion with encryption,
itâs evident they are also party to the activities,
in tandem with them, and so on and so forth.
They try to base their actions on the concept of community rather than what the actions of those communities and the members of the community do,
as if they could decide to decide with impunity as to what they do,
based on their interpretation of the fact,
omitting that they in fact are the ones to seek to divert from their own actions.
So,
as for any fraud cases ,
the actual fraud must be published and explained as to how it is such a fraud as alleged to be a fraud,
and what benefit will the society or community or the public interest gain from not engaging in the fraud activity,
compared to the risk posed by bringing about such a charge against them,
with the evidence against them,
being used for a case of Public Mischief,
which Public Mischief of false report of crime(s),
is one of the risk posed by exposing the fraud,
unless the disclosure of the fraud does benefit the public interest more than by not disclosing it,
compared to the benefit gained from silencing the disclosure of the fraud,
and seeking to forfeit the evidence by refusing it,
which may be a fraudulent benefit, by the way, if there is such a fraud,
so, in this case, an additional damage to society intended to be done to embezzle the evidence as well,
so as to continue to do the previous actions unprosecuted for itâŚ
Then, to add to the potential risk,
add a 2nd charge of Common Nuisance,
since,
if there is a risk of accepting evidence which would be a damage to society,
and not a potential benefit brought about from disclosing fraud,
which disclosure may be used to solve the fraud problem,
by enabling the designer of the new system to be able to integrate the risk of fraud with the new data,
so as to make the new system more secure,
while diminishing the risk of fraud from entities with more power before,
who may unscrupulously seek to try to make money the same fraudulent way,
by seeking to forfeit evidence of fact,
by seeking to justify judgement by their own interpretation of facts,
by modifying facts,
by making falsification of reports of facts,
by making falsification of facts,
by making falsification of the truth,
and by making falsification of the scientific facts,
and by making falsification of science,
and by making falsification of merit of science,
and by making falsification of computer science,
and by making falsification of the science of systems analysis related.
So, if that risk for Common Nuisance is greater than the risk gained by transacting more honestly and not seeking to hide information which users and buyers should know, and that it is for the judge of the Supreme Court to find out,
from the clerk of the Supreme Court who does so accept the evidence,
corroborated by the Military Intelligence,
which already knew,
and already had evidence,
and had already reported it,
which detection system was including in the hardware design with the Trade Secret, for it,
then,
that same military intelligence and their associate are potentially able and warranted to help the party attacked by those actions.
â
If,
on the other hand,
transacting more honestly by not doing that kind of fraud ,
does allow you to increase the value of the transaction integrity,
then,
yes,
it is not only worth more,
but the fraud is potentially a write-off,
if not an illegal transaction with a negative absolute value.
â
Now,
do not confuse Privacy in :
Pretty Good Privacy ,
to be meant to be used as Privacy when it is in fact used for Security.
In other words,
illegal Privacy is and can be used against Security,
rather than be Security.
Additionally,
if someone was to spread propaganda about Privacy,
and about said Privacy,
and if someone was to spread false propaganda about Privacy,
it might be used to cover from other things with,
and,
also,
it might be used to divert from facts related to security and other potential risks related to that security.
So,
to use or create Privacy illegally while increasing risk from it,
it not only a security risk,
but,
can also be illegal,
depending on the law related to it,
and,
also,
depending on the interpretation of the law related to it.
In other words,
if people use this or used this to design weapons to harm others with ,
or,
incriminate them with ,
those actions against those they accuse,
may be used against them,
even though they may seek to justify group actions against the accused and so on.
It doesnât take a computer scientist to figure it out,
but ,
more than one computer scientist are working on it to do so not only figure it out,
but ,
also,
analyze data from those systems used to make the encryption.
â 2. - At 17:42, Sat Apr 17, 2021, 11 minutes later:
Besides,
itâs not like if you need to convince a judge,
or,
influence a judge,
or,
seek security support from a judge,
when there is already scientific evidence,
which scientific evidence they already refused in courts,
and which the prosecuting attorney sought to obligate the judge to work on,
while they sought to forfeit other scientific evidence from computer science courses,
which scientific evidence is not only enough to solve COVID-19,
every time for over a year and a half,
when in fact,
their exact same intent and behavior to seek to forfeit the scientific evidence is what causes the virus to spread from lack of contact with that scientific reality,
which scientific reality is the basis for the mental illness diagnosis of being out of contact with that scientific reality ,
which scientific reality is the scientific reality also being used for cryptocurrency,
including Bitcoins,
which is the exact same level of loss of contact with reality that they do not only experience, but,
seek to subject scientists to be out of contact with that scientific reality,
as they seek to obtain the rights from those scientist for their own control,
which control , due to their lack of contact with reality,
is not a control which is in sync with scientific reality,
to that medical level of loss of contact with reality,
which is banked on by $1 trillion in crypto.
The judge , crown and others unions related will be buried using the same science as before and after, currently so.
â 3. - At 17:52:
Itâs like ,
creating undue fear,
to seek to control,
and get credit from,
by offering security services to recomfort from the undue fear created,
as a hoax to attract, mislead others, rather than mislead oneself,
and divert from the facts,
compared to :
creating a false sense of security,
related to privacy and security,
by omitting critical points related to those systems and how they operate,
and how they exist,
to seek to control by creating this change of level of contact with reality,
which a scientist and doctor can measure with tests and comparison.
216,268 views ⢠Oct 20, 2017
216K views - 3 years ago Saturday Night Live
11.7M subscribers
A spokesperson (Dan Aykroyd) advertises the Bat-O-Matic, the new blender that quickly mixes all the ingredients needed for a Witchâs potion, including an entire bat. [Season 2, 1976]
â 4. - :
Bass-O-Matic - SNL 40th Anniversary Special
94,063 views ⢠Feb 20, 2015
94K views - 6 years ago
2 minutes 24 seconds audio-video.
The Super Bass-O-Matic is back, better than ever and itâs got a brand new name: Super Bass-O-Matic 2150.
â 5. - :
Bass o Matic - YouTube
264,545 views ⢠Feb 3, 2013
264K views - 8 years ago David Garrett
245 subscribers
CC
0:30 seconds audio-video.
CC with ⌠Open Transcript
Thatâs great Bass!
â 6. - :
Dan Aykroyd Explains the Bass-O-Matic
81,232 views ⢠May 17, 2010
81K views - 10 years ago The Food Channel
16.4K subscribers
CC with ⌠Open Transcript.
1 minute 14 seconds audio-video.
Dan Akyroyd explains the product, the bass-o-matic and how Searâs is having a sale on it.
â 7. - :
Evidence suggests that as of 2007, British police investigators are unable to break PGP,[16] so instead have resorted to using RIPA legislation to demand the passwords/keys. In November 2009 a British citizen was convicted under RIPA legislation and jailed for nine months for refusing to provide police investigators with encryption keys to PGP-encrypted files.[17]
â 8. - :
Bass-o-Matic tribute!
54,940 views ⢠Jul 7, 2008
54K views - 12 years ago Tripp888
7 subscribers
CC with ⌠Open Transcript
1 minute 34 seconds audio-video
This is a spec spot I did in a film class a few years back. I grew up on the early SNL gang, so this is my tribute to Dan Akroydâs great work. (He wrote it and acted it.)
Ok, so you donât understand security. Letâs start from the basics: how do you know that your operating system hasnât been compromised? How do you know that the physical CPU your software is running on isnât compromised?
(Hint: itâs faith.)
thatâs just your opinion of which you provided zero evidence.
Do you also need evidence that water is wet? Itâs obvious that if you make a bank that duplicates the function of a conventional bank but with bitcoin instead of real currency that youâre going to have all of the things about conventional banks that you object to. The things you (and other bitcoin fanboys) object to are inherent to the functioning of banks.
multisignature schemes donât make anything less secure
Thank you for confirming that you do not, in fact, understand security.
you really have no idea what youâre talking about. second key can be in a hardware wallet, which would make it a valid 2FA scheme, or it can be sent to a third party that will do a more usual 2FA with me through mobile phone push notifications or SMS. i absolutely can have as many MFA options as i want.
Wait, what happened to moving all of your assets with 12 words? Now you need 12 words plus trust in the integrity and functioning of your third party 2FA provider?
âŚ
Also,
do not confuse integrity and integration of systems in other systems,
and integration of subsystems in other systems,
with attacks against integrity,
and intent to justify to forfeit the right to integrity, to do so, justify attacks against integrity as legal,
with intent to harm others,
or, to harm a target which they seek to coerce in the crime,
so as to justify to be causing them the consequences,
and,
collateral consequences,
when seeking to forfeit evidence of how you tried to coerce the person into crimes,
and,
to make him do wrongdoing,
and,
cause himself to take actions based on facts that he didnât know,
and try to hold him responsible for not knowing,
when in fact,
you offered him a service from encryption,
which encryption is related to security and diplomacy,
such as diplomacy related to 8 US Ambassador candidates to the Pope in Vatican,
which another official works with him about for communication,
with the security for the communication,
in relation to the same diplomacy issues and security,
as security is also related to diplomacy.
It is also not to be confused with interference against right to integrity,
which right to integrity includes the modification of copyright registered and copyright protected material,
some of which copyright protected material may be in the public domain,
some of which copyright protected material may be modified by another author seeking to enrich himself from it,
such as is the case of a federal court judge from a provincial prosecution attorney, with the solicitor general,
in attempts to justify to interfere against integrity related to scientific integrity,
which attacks against such scientific integrity may have to be reported to the Pentagon as well as to other Special Operations related security for Media Relation, and Public Media Relations with the same authorities and powers that be,
including other attacks against other integrity,
related to interference of rights about other integrity than this integrity of copyright, and of authorâs right,
such as right to integrity to mental health,
integrity of communication,
integrity of fact finding,
and interference against integrity of fact finding for investigation with interference and falsification of report about this fact finding,
which integrity is the same integrity used to design inventory programs and information systems related to the evaluation of those inventory programs,
which a court and legislative system seeking to coerce has to be reporting for intending to do so,
while seeking to enrich themselves,
while encrypting such riches and enrichment,
while seeking to discredit the party which is not using this encryption,
but,
rather,
do so provides security for it,
which they have the right to prosecute,
since the security provided is meant to interfere against the security provider security by not informing them enough,
and by seeking to transfer rights interfered against from other cases,
onto others,
as judges decide about in courts,
without rights or ground for 1% of the scientific work and research done for it before,
so as to test the judgesâ level of accuracy of interpretation of facts,
while they sought to obligate to legal association with them,
which they themselves interfered against,
and which the army and military courts have records of since 1983,
including the Martial Courts of Appeal,
as part of NATO and the UN.
â
Similarly,
it is illegal for the same police to get access without warrant,
which warrants are more conditional than precedent,
in the sense that,
no, the authorities do not have to issue a warrant for it before,
but,
upon review,
may decide to issue the warrant after arrest,
if the conditions for warrant and arrest are met,
after,
in which case it may be a false warrant,
if the conditions for the warrant are misinterpreted by the judge,
in which case it may very well be,
especially if the judge is not good,
however,
they too are bound to be unable to provide such security empowered to them to other unwanted parties,
such as to terrorists,
enemies of the state,
or ,
perhaps,
even,
another party than the state,
in which case they abuse their power as well.
â
When you attack a programmerâs right to integrity,
you may in fact attack the rights of all of the work he has done by seeking to appropriate the rights from the work he has done to yourself,
which,
since you did so sought to do so,
may give him the right to not have to be associating with the parties seeking to interfere against those interference against integrity,
and ,
instead,
design new programs to detect those interfere against rights to integrity,
so that other can protect themselves from the courtsâ and legislative systemsâ decision,
in which case that court may also try to make claims of damage to others, by further attack integrity of the works and intellectual property integrity,
and to make claims of making false reports of crimes for goods related to intellectual property from those inventory program and evaluation systems with Electronic Data Transaction Systems,
such that,
the integrity of the work is made to be deemed to be of value too low , despite the costs to maintain integrity and prevent damage from coercion including coercion against moral and ,
coercion against moral rights,
which are the exact same name and words applied for 2 things,
which are related,
as there is no Operating Systems nor Computer Hardware or New Computer Hardware systems without those,
so as to justify to seek to forfeit the rights of the intellectual property work of the inventory program, able to inventor words and value of the words ,
so as to justify to discredit to credit the prosecution.
Either way,
the army has records of it,
and no,
that entity abusing the rights and trying to divert their actions based on another legal system on the planet is not going to solve the security problem they posed against the work of intellectual property,
and yes , those medical behaviors from those authorities have to be reported to World Health Organizations as well as to other local medical authorities due to the risk they posed to intellectual property related to the science and to the medical science.
So yes, they already try to steal from me,
and ,
no,
donât have the right to try to steal from my offspring,
not before birth, not before marriage,
not during marriage, not by seeking to coerce in crimes or forging other evidence before or after,
and also, not after his birth either,
which behavior against integrity I integrate in my programs and systems,
so that my son will benefit from it, to benefit humanity equally.
This is what is called pathological kleptomania.
To try to appropriate keystrokes of others to make others sick from it,
by trying to credit oneself of credit for service to all humanity ,
when one is not with enough integrity to be able to do so serve all humanity,
and,
interfere against their marriage,
so that their offspring cannot serve all humanity,
as their descendants were,
while actually causing a global pandemic due to it ,
because of interference against benefit to humanity,
by seeking to divert from the benefit by crediting others for it,
which do not have the credit for it,
but ,
rather,
have only partial credit for it.
So, a falsification of report of the credit for service to humanity,
which endangers humanity,
and which they additionally intended to and actively tried to attribute the fault to the party they abuse the work of the benefit to humanity,
including with and not limited to,
attribution due to lack of knowledge,
which lack of knowledge they also misinterpret during their deliberate false decision attacking the rights to integrity of work,
including storage costs and other living costs of over $200,000 to $300,000.
â 2. - 22 minutes later, before 19:47, Sat Apr 17, 2021:
I also have designs for logistic programs to serve people like Amazon, eBay and Alibaba since 1985 when I graduated secondary school, and the school in fact has the proof of that, from the official who did give me the graduation from the test.
â 3. - At 19:47:
I can also organize and register copyrights for Stock Market and apply for patents for it,
as it would greatly improve pandemic response with improved logistics for in case of problematic living conditions such as this or worse in the future, while working to reduce the costs of such measures as well as improving environment, as,
the lockdown has a very good effect on the environment,
even though it is possible to improve the environment more,
and,
to make the environment more efficient than we need it to be ,
so that we can handle the load of having more people or,
more adverse conditions,
better ,
in the future,
for the present,
and,
the next present times.
â 4. - 28 minutes later, at 19:48, 3 minutes after the last update:
OMAHA, Neb., April 08, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) â Exodus Movement, Inc., a Delaware corporation that has developed a leading non-custodial cryptocurrency software platform, received notice that the Securities and Exchange Commission has qualified its offering of Class A common stock under Regulation A. The company will begin offering shares in the Exodus Wallet at 9:00 pm ET today.
Clickherefor a video with instructions to set up your investor profile, fund your Wallet and use the Shares app.
WHAT: Exodus Regulation A+ sale of Class A common stock at $27.42/share Read the SEC Filing regarding the companyhere.
|GET READY:|1. Go to your Exodus Wallet.*
2. Ensure your wallet is updated - instructions are here.
3. Get verified.**
4. Fund your wallet in advance with Bitcoin, Ethereum or USD Coin.|
||||
||WHEN:|April 8, 2021 at 9:00 pm ET|
||||
||PURCHASE:|1. Go to your Exodus Wallet.*
2. Ensure your wallet is updated - instructions are here.
3. Submit amount.
Minimum investment: 1 share
Maximum investment: 2,733,229 shares
(Note: depends on share availability; sales are on a first come first served base)|
A few years ago, after the government bailed out all the banks (again), a buddy of mine asked me how he could become a banker. He thought it sounded like a pretty good deal. At the time, I told him it was impossible; you have to be born into a thing like that.
But now, Bitcoin allows people to play make-believe banker. It is probably a lot of fun to see meaningless stuff that you created for free shooting up in value at an exponential rate. I think it would be better if it were just done as a dollhouse simulation, rather than letting people invest a bunch of real money in it. Oh well. Maybe people will learn the lesson better with so much skin in the game.
I like to see peopleâs greedy, self-contented, smug statements during the ârampant deflationâ phase of the Bitcoin run up. I can just imagine how indignant they would be if they had lent Bitcoin to peasant farmers to buy seeds, and then the farmers couldnât pay back the loans with their crops 6 months later.
It just goes to show, we are all the same. These Libertarian Bitcoin fanatics believe themselves to be infinitely superior to the corrupt government and fractional-reserve bankers, but they are actually exactly the same, driven by the same greed and belief in their own exceptionalism and superiority.
â 3. - At 20:58, 15 minutes later, 12 minutes after the last update:
Are you doing a traditional IPO?
No. We are conducting an offering of up to $75 million of shares of our Class A common stock pursuant to Regulation A. Both accredited investors and non-accredited investors are able to participate in the Regulation A offering.
The Class A common stock under Regulation A will be offered in the following manner:
Subscriptions for the shares of Class A common stock will be made through mobile or desktop versions of the Exodus Wallet Shares app that are available for download at exodus.com, the Apple iOS app store, and the Google Play store.
Subscriptions for the shares will be paid for with Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH) and USD Coin (USDC).
Securitize, Inc., a Delaware corporation and registered transfer agent, is our transfer agent for the Shares, serving U.S. and international stockholders.
Within nine months after the qualification of the offering, we anticipate that the shares will be represented by digital Common Stock Tokens on a blockchain and the Common Stock Tokens will be held in the Exodus Wallet. The ownership and transfer of the shares will still be recorded on the books of Securitize (our transfer agent), and Securitizeâs records will still be the definitive legal record of ownership, but the Common Stock Tokens will be recorded on a blockchain.
Why are you considering this route versus a more traditional registered IPO?
Due to our positive performance to date, rather than conduct a private Series A preferred stock offering or fully registered IPO, we chose a financing option that, consistent with our mission, empowers our customers to participate in our capital raise through their Exodus wallets, and to purchase the common stock with certain digital assets. As such, we are raising capital through an SEC-qualified offering pursuant to Regulation A. We believe this has the potential to revolutionize fundraising.
Who is Securitize?
Securitize, a Delaware corporation, is our transfer agent registered with the SEC. More information about Securitize can be found here.
Why do I need to KYC to participate?
We are required to have a transfer agent and they are required to have KYC.
How do I delete my KYC?
The fastest way to make a request to delete your KYC is via the Securitize widget. To use, please:
At this time, we do not intend to list our common stock on a stock exchange. However, we intend to make our Class A common stock available for trading on several alternative trading systems (ATS), including the tZERO ATS and the Securitize ATS no later than nine months after the qualification of the Offering. Weâll keep you updated. Please know that your Securitize IDs will be essential to the future availability of Exodus shares.
I am located internationally; can I buy?
Weâre exploring partnerships with other entities, such as MERJ Exchange, that could potentially make Exodus shares available for those in jurisdictions outside of the USA. Weâll keep you updated. Please know that your Securitize IDs will be essential to the future availability of Exodus shares.
I am located in Arizona, Texas or Florida Internationally, how can I invest?
Weâre exploring partnerships with alternative trading systems (ATS) such as tZero, that could potentially make Exodus shares available in your jurisdiction, which are currently blocked due to Blue Sky laws. Weâll keep you updated. Please know that your Securitize IDs will be essential to the future availability of Exodus shares.
How do you make money?
We derive our revenues from API integration fees (both transaction- and non-transaction-based) that we charge to third parties who develop applications that our customers can access from the Exodus Wallet through an API.
How can I learn more about the company and your business model?
Exodus is the maker of the Exodus Wallet, which provides an easy-to-use interface that enables our customers to manage their crypto assets on their desktop computers and mobile phones or transfer their assets to physical storage devices such as Trezor for added security.
The Exodus Wallet is non-custodial, meaning that our customersâ private keys are encrypted locally on their own devices and Exodus can never access or take control of our customersâ funds. We derive our revenues from API integration fees (both transaction- and non-transaction-based) that we charge to third parties who develop applications that our customers can access from the Exodus Wallet through an API.
Our desktop platform was first released in December 2015 to address an underserved market opportunity by allowing customers to access advanced wallet technology on the desktop. Since the creation of the Exodus Wallet, we estimate that we have had approximately 1.25 million customers with funded wallets across our desktop and mobile platforms.
You can learn more about our company and its products by reviewing our Regulation A offering circular that we have publicly filed with the SEC here, this presentation, or by going to our website here or our YouTube channel.
â 3.2. - At 21:00:
This term refers to state statutes, rules and regulations providing for the supervision and regulation of offers and sales of securities. Blue sky laws also require the registration or licensure of brokerage firms, their brokers, and investment adviser representatives. âŚ
USD Coin (USDC) represents a major breakthrough in how we use money. Digital dollars work like other digital content â they move at the speed of the internet âŚ
In a nutshell, USD Coin is a service to tokenize US dollars and facilitate their use over the internet and public blockchains. Besides, USDC tokens can be changed back to USD at any time. The execution of issuing and redeeming USDC tokens is ensured with ERC-20 smart contract.
In Ontario, as outlined on the RECO website, the following people may need to submit a Canadian Criminal Record & Judicial Matters Check.
âŚ
¡ Applicants who have pending charges and/or criminal record history.
Online Trading Is Not Just For Financial Experts. Learn How With Our Educational Tools. Member Of The Canadian Investor Protection Fund. Warning: Your Capital Is At Risk. Real-Time Quotes. Get A Demo Account. 12/5 Support. Free Registration.
your position here is that itâs secure because you can build separate security mechanisms on top of it
no, if you donât understand my position - ask questions instead of jumping to conclusions. bitcoin is secure because of combination of cryptography and proof of work.
lightning network has vulnerabilities identified by the developers. I donât know or care if they track those through CVEs.
bitcoin vulnerabilities have CVEs, either list CVEs you think lightning network introduced to bitcoin or stop making â â â â up.
Youâre clearly not particularly technical if you think those statements conflict
âwasting energy does not secure bitcoinâ and â[energy required by bitcoin mining] is a single aspect of security thoughâ
talk to me after you sort things out in your head
I have a couple of decades worth of professional experience.
apparently completely worthless experience if you canât recognize that 2FA can be enabled by multisignature schemes and handing over a key slice to third party or controlling it via hardware wallet.
No, thatâs a fact. It absolutely, unequivocally is not an alternate financial system.
no, it absolutely, unequivocally is an alternative financial system.
you have to have faith that the developers wonât change the code in ways that break it and that people will continue to run nodes
no, i donât have to faith in that because developers donât dictate which code runs on usersâ and minersâ machines. and as long as there are parties interested in btcoin - they will be running bitcoin code, so there is no faith involved in there either, cold hard logic.
A grocer is not going to suddenly decide to start breaking the law and risk his business just so you can pay with pretend money
some wonât. some will.
if bitcoin were banned for all legal purposes and you continued to use it that you would be supporting child abusers
my usage of bitcoin will have nothing to do with criminalsâ usage of bitcoin. just like your usage of USD (hopefully) doesnât have anything to do with criminalsâ usage of USD.
and that idea is not expressed by statement âchild abusers will be happy for your patronageâ, unless youâre happy to be accused of being a patron of child abusers without any evidence, are you?
insured limit on bitcoin is ZERO. So holding any bitcoin whatsoever immediately puts you over that limit
correct. and you know what else is different? bitcoin i own is MINE. USD you own is not yours, itâs a record in a bank that can disappear on a whim, you only own a promise that you will be able access that USD. that is why you always need to care if you will be allowed to access it and how much of it will be returned to you if bank or government goes belly up.
less safe than a conventional bank
way more safe than a conventional bank.
for any normal person, they gain nothing at all from a shift to a cryptocurrency but they lose a whole load of protections
they lose protections but they gain actual ownership of their assets, not ownership of promises.
you havenât demonstrated any capabilities so far to make assessments like that.
how do you know that your operating system hasnât been compromised? How do you know that the physical CPU your software is running on isnât compromised?
i donât and i donât have to. because i can verify transaction signatures on multiple devices before i broadcast it to the network. i doubt you know what any of those words mean thoughâŚ
Itâs obvious that if you make a bank that duplicates the function of a conventional bank but with bitcoin instead of real currency that youâre going to have all of the things about conventional banks that you object to
no, you can make a bank that doesnât have properties that i object to. like opacity, unaccountability, inability to prove bankâs reserves, etc.
what happened to moving all of your assets with 12 words
flexibility dumbass. i can be as flexible with my security as i want. i can have multisignature mfa schemes for convenience with backup master key for absolute control. why do you even argue about things you have literally no understanding of?
Please explain, in your own words, what a side channel attack is.
i donât and i donât have to. because i can verify transaction signatures on multiple devices before i broadcast it to the network. i doubt you know what any of those words mean thoughâŚ
Like I said, you donât understand security. If a keylogger on your PC gets your precious 12 words then the attacker can use them to verify their fraudulent transactions. You have more faith and trust than people who use conventional currency.
you know, iâm already used to you claiming â â â â without any evidence. youâre not so different from Merin in that.
all theat secures is the consensus
which is exactly what bitcoin was designed to solve - decentralized trustless consensus.
the developers of lightning are aware of multiple vlnerabilities in the lightning network
see, if there were any vulnerabilities in bitcoin introduced by lightning network - youâd already list them. however youâre so clueless about any of that, you donât even recognize that lightning is completely separate project and there were no changes introduced to bitcoin to make lightning work. in fact an existing bug was fixed. youâre embarrassing yourself.
If you think those statements conflict
yeah, you can gaslight all you want, i donât need to say anything else on this matter.
Itâs not though. At most itâs a digital stock system.
itâs a financial system.
If the bitcoin developers introduce a significant change then bitcoin changes. If some people disagree and refuse to run the new code then the chain splits and the code they are running is no longer bitcoin.
lol you really are clueless. thatâs not how any of this works. changes to bitcoin consensus protocol are not determined by developers alone.
So then you have no idea how businesses operate. Thanks for confirming.
youâre free to believe that. you already believe all sorts of stupid â â â â .
by continuing to use it you would make it easier for more serious criminals to move their funds
iâm going to disregard your future statements unless they provide some evidence or explain a mechanism. youâre generating too much â â â â â â â â for me to even attempt to debunk.
If the bitcoin developers, miners and node operators all agreed that your balance should be zero, they could change that and you would have no ability to challenge it
and if government decided to zero out your account - you would have no ability to change that either. the difference is that governments do that all the time and for bitcoin it would be a disastrous move that would completely destroy credibility of the project. itâs a hypothetical that doesnât even need to be taken into account due to how many completely independent people and organizations would have to collude to make that happen.
