Please explain to me how an air gapped PC is in any way relevant to bitcoin, a system which by definition requires a network connection to function.
And I noticed you dodged my question to you about side channel attacks. Thank you for admitting that you donât understand security and can only parrot the bitcoin fanboy talking points about âI HAVE PROOF OF WORK AND 12 WORDS!!!â.
Where is the part about the minimum costs and other requirements not listed for pieces of ID and other instruments presumably used for security while in fact abusing the data to spy on, perhaps without the said license to actually be authorized to do the spying in question(s) or charge(s) legally so.?
â
2. - :
The government sought to forfeit my PGP encryption keys,
including public and private keys,
which I store,
and which they attack the integrity of,
as well as other integrity for other evidence they seek to divert from,
as I know that they try to indict others with while refusing evidence,
in relation to those exact same encryption systems,
even without using different memory address to steal the data from the keys from other systems.
So,
Iâm against the crypto and against the government with them too,
and Iâm offered government work from another country with the same military organization of that government which the army allows me to do.
Additionally,
I donât have to stop them to incriminate themselves.
I also donât have to prove how they seek to forfeit evidence,
because they sought to justify the sought forfeiture of those evidence in courts,
while they are the ones liable for the crimes they try to falsely accuse of,
enough that they forced all ambassadors from Russia out of the US with lies of interference against their elections,
to treacherously cover up dissent spread in their own other systems,
to try to hide for other military pile up against them.
Itâs not only false, but they also do worse than that to them,
and they are also liable for hacking and spying on their own elections,
as well as other systems.
So yes, those are also military related charges not only against the integrity of their attacks against integrity, but, also against their integrity, with evidence of how integrity is, and how better integrity which is better and that much better to solve this pandemic and other problems from attacks against integrity in error and deliberate errors of impunity, against the Errors and Omissions Insurance, which is their courts and government insurance and the insurance of the military court.
how an air gapped PC is in any way relevant to bitcoin, a system which by definition requires a network connection to function
just shows again how clueless you are. you donât need internet access to sign a transaction, you can do that offline on air gapped computer and after verifying that signatures are correct you can transfer that signed transaction to computer that does have internet connection and send it from there.
youâre just showing your ignorance with every post, donât embarrass yourself.
This thread is evidence
you didnât list a single position that i changed in the course of entire discussion. you just state that i did without providing evidence. do you understand the word âevidenceâ? or is it like with your understanding of bitcoin?
Sure, but that doesnât mean that energy secures bitcoin as a whole
âso the claim that bitcoin is secured by energy is falseâ is again in conflict with âall theat secures is the consensusâ. bitcoin is a tools that solves decentralized consensus problem and so whatever secures that solution secures bitcoin. youâre just nitpicking at this point.
I already gave you one example
no you didnât, you only claim that vulnerabilities exist but refuse to actually link any.
This is a baseless accusation. Iâve not stated that itâs not a separate project. That doens;t change the fact that anyone using lightning is using a layer that adds further security flaws.
accusation is not baseless because of claims like this. but without you providing ANY info about what those vulnerabilities are itâs hard to debunk your bs. which seems to be probably your strategy anyway because you donât have any actual arguments.
accusations that Iâm clueless simply because I dont; agree
no, youâre clueless because you make statements that are disconnected from reality. developers donât dictate consensus rules, thatâs just not how it works.
government has no power to zero out my account
again, clueless.
and even if they did I could still challnge them legally
and i wouldnât have to care about it because government doesnât have power to zero out my bitcoin wallet.
The vast majority of people have never and will never have their bank accounts zeroed out by a government
irrelevant. i prefer a system where itâs impossible not just very unlikely. also just that you live in a country where itâs very unlikely doesnât mean other people do.
doesnât mean it canât happen
i can live with that risk. how can you live with this cognitive dissonance in your head? youâve just dismissed the argument about governmentâs control over your money because itâs very unlikely, to which a valid refutation according to you should be âdoesnât mean it canât happenâ? youâre a joke.
reversing a transaction caused by a flaw in the software would also be disasterous for the project
already happened, was not disastrous. transactions that break bitcoin consensus protocol due to a bug are certainly reversible by chain reorganization. not saying it would be a smooth process, but certainly not as controversial as collusion by multiple parties to overwhelm the network and instate censorship.
and you are not elaborating on what exactly is wrong. you statement that my statement is wrong is wrong. how long do you want to continue doing this?
go read the statements made by the lightning devs
youâre the one who should demonstrate evidence in support of your claims. so far itâs just your fantasy.
You do understand that the consensue rules are baked into the software and that software is controlled by the developers, right?
software is not controlled by developers, developers and other users are free to suggest and implement changes to the protocol but no party unilaterally can force these changes to be adopted by the network. youâre clueless.
all you have to do is call me clueless and you think thatâs an argument
i only call you clueless after providing evidence as to why youâre clueless. i did it every time. donât be so butthurt.
But they have the ability to make it effectively worthless and jail you for using it. And itâs vastly more likely that will happen than they will coume around deleteing money from my account for a laugh
that is irrelevant to the question of whether they can make my BTC balance to be 0BTC, they canât. and historically governments donât have a great track record of stability, people get screwed all the time and if your last defense is that my bitcoin can become worthless - your USD is becoming worthless every single day for last hundred years.
It was discussed again in 2019 when binance was hacked
a wild speculation by binance owner is not exactly âit was discussedâ, just a tweet that everybody promptly ignored.
It would demonstrate that itâs not censorship resistant and immutable and would likely tank the price
which is exactly why the chance of that happening is vanishingly small. smaller than chance of currency collapse due to inflation or any other economic crisis.
nah, it was only discussed in context of being idiotic. of course youâre free to provide links to valid discussions where this suggestion is treated seriously, but given that all you can do is generate â â â â â â â â without any evidence, like in case of those bitcoin vulnerabilities somehow introduced by lightning, i donât expect much from you.
You think the chances of bitcoin rolling back transactions if a bug caused a bunch of people to lose thair balance is vanishly small.
no, that was about collusion between miners and developers. if there is a bug that breaks consensus protocol - transactions will be rolled back because they are not bitcoin transactions.
your claim that it was only discussed in the context of being idiotic requires no proof, but I need to provide links
youâre the one making claims - you should provide evidence/proofs. it was your claim that binance ownerâs statement in 2019 was discussed seriously. it was your claim that lightning introduced vulnerabilities into bitcoin. show me evidence or gtfo.
At the end of the day youâre going to believe what you want to believe regardless of what the facts state. Thatâs because you are an extremist.
that applies to you to much higher degree judging from this conversation. you failed to provide any evidence for any of your claims, you failed to even acknowledge that you are making self-contradictory claims, etc. thereâs just no point continuing this, feel free to have the last word, youâre not sensible and thinking human being as far as iâm concerned. bye.
Why do you equate libertarians with BitCoin? I know lots of bitcoin types who are not libertarians, quite a few in fact are bernniebros.
The same people who attack communication as bad,
try to do so to others,
in a way so as to justify their own failures in communication,
as they seek to cover and control by communication gap they seek to create , to create secret,
as if it was legal for them to try to control with secrets,
when those same secrets they create harm people and cause death from unfairnessâŚ
Additionally,
they also not only seek to omit the communication gap they create,
so as to try to control others with it,
but also try to blame others for communication problems,
due to their lack of communications skills,
while they themselves seek to attack the efficiency of the same targets that they seek to attack the efficiency of the communication of,
and exactly for the same reasons and goals, and objectives.
They also seek to cover interference against FCC rules,
and seek to justify misinterpretation of those rules as they see fit,
to not only interfere against hardware to solve the problems they create,
from the communication gap they seek to create,
but,
also,
to attack solutions related to those interference,
including how they seek to coerce others to be interfered,
and how they seek to justify to interfere against their right,
after trying to hide how they try to coerce them with the same communication gap,
including communication gap related to inventory programs,
which they lie they donât know about.
If they donât know about inventory program,
how can they even make an inventory of the secret they seek to omit?
They do not only make no sense, or, little sense, if any at all,
itâs also blatant theft and theft attempts and seeking to justify the abuse in courts from the courts themselves, who are also no better at misinterpreting the abuse, to the point as to be obligated to join a police force to stop their abuse.
â
They now just gave me some insider information from companies which is ridiculous since the military intelligence officer already told me that an Estonian was refused a brokerage license for over 7 years in a row because that she always had insider information during her tests.
That same business and the same people who share insider information and try to refer me to a broker who wouldnât know,
like if I didnât have an inventory program to track them like a Bounty Hunter would.
Seems to me they are the ones smuggling the goods.
I felt that calling them starry-eyed pot-smoking utopian dreamers would be inflammatory. Libertarians and Berniebros both tend to be pot smoking utopian dreamers, so perhaps the inflammatory term would have been better? 
This is actually funny. If the USD is considered an example of monetary failure over the last 100 years then I am speechless.
Utopian Dreamers would be sufficient I think. Yet, many BTC holders are neither. BTC/BitCoin bugs might be better.
865,940 views ⢠Jul 11, 2019
847K views - 1 year ago
Matthew Weathers
543K subscribers
No one on Earth knows how to reverse one of the most popular computer algorithms. Yet itâs really easy to compute one-way. You could make billions of dollars if you solved this mathematics problem, which is computed quintillions of times per second in the race for mining Bitcoin. SHA256 has some amazing properties, is useful for digital signatures, cryptography, authentication, and is a central part of the Bitcoin protocol.
Bitcoin and other âcrypto-currenciesâ rely on one-way hash functions like the SHA-256 algorithm to secure the blockchain where all the transactions are kept.
â
lol
Right, so,
why is the USD,
my USD,
not yours,
unless yours is we too, or not we too, maybe, maybe not?
Right, why is it so worthless as you have the information about ,
and,
imparting that information to others in this forum thread,
every single day,
for last hundred years,
and not,
1 day more?
And, which army caused this money loss against the income of the US Army who might as well get paid in your currency, for the last 100 years, and exchange your rate for it too?!
Maybe the inflammatory term is caused by an abusive acid placed where he normally sits down,
which is not locked by a locked door,
or something?
Maybe put a Soft / Extra Large , Heavy Fabric , Hypoallergenic , Sterile , Latex Free , $1.25 , Breathable, Adhesive Bandage over it.
2 in x 4 in
For medical
emergencies seek
medical help
Get a heavy-bomber and dump all the extra weed in the Iceland and St.Vincent Volcanose
SOS Alert ⢠Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Itâs only to help the good people.
âGive us your bitcoin keys or we execute your family.â
just shows again how clueless you are. you donât need internet access to sign a transaction, you can do that offline on air gapped computer and after verifying that signatures are correct you can transfer that signed transaction to computer that does have internet connection and send it from there.
âYou can use an air gapped PC, you just have to break the air gap.â
Because libertarians are the ones with sufficient ideological commitment to opposing the state that theyâre able to ignore bitcoinâs practical issues. Normal people see a system that charges higher transaction fees than paypal and has less security than their bank and say âno thanksâ, libertarians love it because it is âfreedomâ. Textbook example: Arkhis declaring that he would continue to use illegal bitcoin even if it is banned, and expecting that businesses would all join his resistance against the âNazi governmentâ because that matters more than making money.
The dollar has lost in the upper 90s percent of its value in the last 100 years. With a mandate of âPrice Stabilityâ, the Fed has failed in that responsibility. Itâs true responsibility is its 6% dividend yield to its stock holders. In that regard, the Fed has done a wonderful job.
Thatâs funny. From which source are you getting such information?
âYou can use an air gapped PC, you just have to break the air gap.â
you do realize there are ways of transmitting information from your pc without connecting it to anything? for instance have you ever heard of this thing, called DISPLAY?
itâs mind boggling that you will rather have people think youâre dumb as a toaster rather than agree that iâm right 
though of course youâre also completely ok with accusing others of being child abusers because they donât agree with your opinions, so iâm not surprised after all.
Really, thatâs where you wanna go?