Why didnt u sell on top? 📉

Bitcon, succesful again.

That doesnt make it less con.

Again with the classic cyrpto fanatic viewpoint. Anyone who doesn’t agree can’t possibly understand it.

So, never?

So what? Ponzi schemes often show returns, that’s how people get baited into them. It’s been demonstrated multiple times in this thread alone that cryptocurrency is backed by nothing. its entire value comes from convincing new “investors” to buy in at a higher price, and that the growth is unsustainable long term. And yet you still scream “BUT NUMBER GO UP!” as if that in itself proves something.

You’ll keep buying and keep holding but at some point the bubble will burst and everyone still holding will find out just how irrelevant the market cap figures are.

There will be next bubble and next and next. Of course this is a permenent con, designed like a cassino, to make gamblers redistribute their money. It isnt pretty, but people want to do it. Like in article I posted above. It will not be gone, because people who are like that are not gone from society. They are born every day.

Maybe, if the atractiveness of it for them will fade… They would need a stronger con to be hooked into.

There might be a new bubble in the form of a new coin, but bitcoin itself can’t keep growing anywhere near the same levels it has been. Based on the models the crypto fanatics seem to be betting on, bitcoin would hold more value than the entire global economy in 8-10 years. I also think it’s unlikely that if bitcoin were to suffer a complete collapse that it would build back up again. The name at that point would be burned so they’d have to spin up a new name at least.

What’s likely to happen is that the gains will start to decrease, and the influx of new buyers will decrease which will then compound the effect of the reduced gains. Once people with the fattest wallets realise it’s peaked, theyll start to sell off and the price will come down. People will see them selling and try to jump on board.

The problem is that unlike a regular market, trading won’t halt when the price plummets so the speed at which the price drops has no real lower bounds, it’s all up to when people are willing to gamble and buy back in because the whole gamble of bitcoin is that someone will buy your coins at a value higher than you paid for them. If the price is falling most normal people aren’t going to buy in. This is the fundamental problem of a market cap on an asset that holds no inherent value, the market cap is irrelevant if what people are willing to pay drastically changes.

Another issue is that exchanges aren’t regulated when it comes to crypto deposits so if an exchange runs into trouble they just zero the crypto balances of their customers and close up shop. All they have to return is balances held in fiat.

People mix up security from diplomacy and encryption used for that diplomacy and how it is potentially applied wrongfully from parties who are not diplomatic, working against that diplomacy.

Notice, here,
that I didn’t use the term democracy, which is another concept, even though related in some ways.

The reason it is diplomacy is related to the war.

No peace would exist currently without that encryption, diplomacy, and, ambassadors working for that peace.

We would be in conflict, and, what needs to be protected by encryption would be possible to be intercepted by undiplomatic parties seeking to make the diplomacy seem to be undiplomatic and criminal and sick and so on.

That is why , when encryption is traded, which value is really not for trade, but, rather for other reasons, such as security, and peace, it can end up in the wrong hands.

Also, to not pay tax on it aggravates this, and yes, can start a war.

So, yes, while encryption is good and used for computer program, which computer language use a form of encryption to interact with the processor, which every company uses, and while hardware also uses encryption to interact with other systems as well,
the stress level applied to it from parties which are against that global peace with the UN and the related rights to program and safeguard those programs and intellectual property as right to be inventory for data storage and intellectual property and run in RAM, and processor, including Crypto-currency, and ,
the stress level applied to it from parties which are for that global peace, with the UN and the related rights to program and safeguard
those programs and intellectual property as right to be inventory for data storage and intellectual property and run in RAM, and processor,
including Crypto-currency,
if it is used bad,
it is a weapon against that diplomacy.

It is also an act of war.

I transferred $100 from Personal account to Crypto which will be available for trade in 3 days.

My crypto is up around 8% while my stocks took a dive today after Bill Gates divorce news, which is not news about how it affects moral, including related to attacks on forums or others systems, including legal systems and military systems.

I should also invest either $50 more in the current broker and wallet I have to buy $100 in Dogecoin , which, if I had known that, would now be worth 1,000% from my cost, which is $10,000 on a thousand, and yes, $40,000 on a $4,000,
which,
by itself,
is enough profit to be getting above average income since they protect my income earned from stocks or crypto.

They also plan to change real estate transactions as capital gains tax instead of not being a capital gains tax as it used to be before which is further inflate real estate values and markets.

Gates news has nothing to do with it. Janet Yellen made some noises about interest rates, presumably so Jerome Powell could keep his hands clean.

Yes, what is has to do with it is the moral issue that it has to do with the operating systems and selling short.

That is why the tech stocks took a dive.

The other info you mentioned are just other things related to it.

This system uses Bill Gates Intellectual Property to reply your comment that it has nothing to do it.

The system has such integrity that it even managed to accept that input from you without changing the level of certainty ratio related to it.

I also work with them so are my co-workers and they make a few shows every week for it called Windows Weekly also streamed on Twitch once a week and they also work for the president security as well as military security as well as with NATO and the UN too.

It has to do with my $1 million minimum project with him before the 9-11.

Even the army got in the office for it.

Even the army got in the office for it.

Dogecoin from $0.0004 to $0.60+ = over 1,000 times more, to 1,500 times more.

0.0004 - 0.0008 = 100% - 2 times.
0.0004 - 0.0044 = 1,000% - 11 times.
0.0004 - 0.0084 = 2,000% - 21 times.
0.0004 - 0.0404 = 10,000% - 101 times.
0.0004 - 0.4004 = 100,000% - 1001 times.

From $100 investment to $1,000 profit in sale = 10 times.
From $100 investment to $10,000 profit in sale = 100 times.
From $100 investment to $100,000 profit in sale = 1,000 times.

From $3,000 investment to $30,000 profit in sale = 10 times.
From $3,000 investment to $300,000 profit in sale = 100 times.
From $3,000 investment to $3,000,000 profit in sale = 1,000 times.

You can put $3 in a slot machine and win a $30m jackpot for a 10,000,000x return too. Doesn’t stop it being a gamble. Baiting people in with theoretical returns is a classic ponzi scheme tactic though.

1 Like

Sounds like state sponsored retirement programs.

Indeed.

Stop misrepresenting my posts. Don’t be such an ass.

:rofl: I’m not, I call it as I see it.

So you’ve chosen to prove you are an ass. Good Job.

Sure, if you say so.