2012 Alliance Panel @fanfest part deux


(Quinn Chilastra) #1

I really think CCP needs to make a new statement on this or it will just keep getting brought up, and used as a comparison for anything that happens. If it’s a new team and new policy then that team needs to assert themselves using that as an example. I’m not saying go back and punish anyone again.

https://web.archive.org/web/20140210194322/http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/28576

In this “In Development Blog” GM Salmon said that the slide and everything up to the QA was perfectly fine. I can’t imagine CCP still agrees with this. CCP needs to make that known.

By not asserting themselves CCP is allowing toxic behavior to breed, as evidenced by reddit yesterday where the vast majority didn’t think Mittani did anything wrong.

TO THE ISD. READ WHAT YOU QUOTED WHEN YOU LOCKED THE LAST ONE AND WHAT I ACTUALLY WROTE. THIS IS A DISCUSSION OF THE PANEL EVENTS AND POLICY. I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT “This thread is being closed, as it’s relates to the suspension and banning of accounts.”. DO YOUR JOB AND READ FIRST


(Quinn Chilastra) #2

And ISD is replying to it. Man this is a sad day for CCP.

How do you even PM someone on these forums?


(ISD Eshtir) #3

Read the whole quote, esp. the first part, that i had in my reply to your thread. You find the reasoning there. I suggest you stop this now if you would like to continue posting on the forums.

If you constantly have to evaluate what someone did 5 years ago, based on the policy that was in place at that time, CCP wouldnt have time developing a game. Even if you do not agree, its time to move on.

PS: Yes i reply to your thread. Its my job since 2005. :wink:


(ISD Eshtir) #4