Are you really deliberately trying to annoy people so much they have no intention of continuing.
I can forgive the fact that you threw l5 difficulty at players who were starting, After 100+ they did eventually get ONE sensible one that wasn't just noise so they could actually progress.
but now, after getting to the high 80s, EVERY BLOODY "gold standard" sample is absolutely brain meltingly impossible, maybe .001% data amongst the noise. heading fast back to 1%
Of course if one had an entire day between individual samples, better tools, and a few years experience, one MIGHT get lucky one time in a hundred or so.
as it is, THIS IS A GAME. and we aren't getting paid, and we are not going to be happy to write a paper about the ONE BLOODY transit we saw that a hundred other scientists would dispute.
Sort this out, if your dear scientist wants us to solve the samples they and their supercomputers cannot solve, he needs to modify his expectations.
our role is to be a first pass through the data, finding the more obvious transits for further investigation.
judging us by the "gold standard" of impossible transits, just won't work.
I may or may not give this pile of rabid monkeys another go, or maybe not.
tl;dr sort your stuff out!
Edit, Right, that was the final straw, thats, 20% points lost, it seems if you fail a l5 every one after that "evaluates" uses a L5. so that's it, send me a mail when this is not so absurdly broken.