You’ll have to forgive Mr. Syagrius, Mr. Sepphiros. Mr. Syagrius is a simple merchant, who trades in thinly-veiled threats and militarism robed in classical ideals.
Mr. Syagrius, is yours a nation or a mob? I ask this, because a nation’s laws are to represent its ideals, to codify them so that they survive generations. Why, then, would you abandon the very thing you seek to protect?
In any case, enough of that.
Work on the next filing continues, and we hope for consideration by the court in all due time thereafter.
I would like to take this opportunity to publicly entreat the Hyasyoda Corporation and Kaalakiota Corporation to do the right thing for themselves, for their shareholders, and for the State, by demonstrating that they do not need to be engaged with lawsuits to comply with the Hope For All Act.
The Kasaras embezzlement and the Kyonoke Pit security breach have already killed millions. It is for the best that we speak of this openly, that we learn what went wrong, and that we strengthen our policies and procedures to prevent something like this from ever happening again. The confidence and safety of the citizenry depends on it.
I agree with you that the truth must be made on all the facts. This aspect of things though isn’t my specialty, I admit. I regularly share thoughts and talks with ARC group even if I’m not a member of it myself and here I would put a divergent view.
It seems to me that you’re puting lot more strength into pursuing the Federation (through FIO) than into pursuing the State. You only strongly suggested to the corporations concerned to push forward their investigations, and that’s good, but you already did it before and so far for no effective results. In fact those corporations (or maybe just one) were the one enclined to make those investigations. Still surprised, or not so much, that the CEP rejected such investigations.
This case might only lead to know few things that happened aboard RP4 but probably will not enlight us on the whole events.
All participants signed the HFA Act. Caldari State, Federation, DED, SoCT should be facing their responsibilities, not just one of them, or not just one corporation or service.
So, maybe as some suggested it, the application of the HFA Act should have been submitted to CONCORD (or a proper broader legal jurisdiction than just a Federation one).
I repeat, I agree about the interrogations concerning the facts, I just regret that it could be interpreted as a stigmatization of one organism/state and I hope that you will also do the same with the other organisms concerned by the Act.
I salute the work done as such files are harduous to complete.
The admonishment isn’t directly associated with the FIO lawsuit. Rather, it is associated with HFA compliance. As Hyasyoda was the operator of the Kyonoke mining pit, their involvement in its continued quarantine warrants disclosure of their review of the incident leading to the outbreaks in Oijanen, Muttokon, Postouvin, and Efu.
Mr. Elendil is correct that no suit has been filed against State corporations on the matter of HFA compliance at this time.
Can I ask why not? From what I understand of the crisis Caldari organisations were as complicit in the spread of this contagion as Federation organisations were.
Counsel has advised me to not discuss legal strategy in a public forum. Suffice it to say, however, that there is a strategy, and that its end goal is full compliance with HFA Act rules by all relevant parties.
Ishukone Corporation has always shown its willingness towards open collaboration and compliance with the Federal government, its agencies, and its laws.
I consider it laudable, that the traditions of Federal collaboration and compliance begun with Ishukone is now followed by the Arataka Research Consortium.
Of course, the rule of law is a cornerstone of democracy.
Perhaps it will. However, the Federal Intelligence Office operates under the Executive branch and remains solely under the oversight of the President. Freedom of Information requests of the FIO, while not uncommon, remain ostensibly under the discretion of the Office of the President to release, irrespective of the demands of either the Judicial or Legislative branches to do so.