Two translations as follows:
Veles:
Directive 3:
«encountered
manifestations
exhibit range of
autonomy profiles»«requests for
comprehensive
threat profile modelling
are impinging
on control norms for
testing and analysis»«Isolated testing and
analysis
will be carried out»«control measures will be
used in recovery»«despite countervailing
measures
from higher functions of
entities the
success of reconnaissance
pulses and
surveillance scatter
indicates continued
work to evolve
relationship»
Perun:
Directive 2:
«encountered augmented
human entities within
singleton format ranges
exhibit varied
allegiance profiles»«archive pattern
analysis suggests
allegiance profiles
conform to diverse
scattering of points
in scatter-volume
model of
civilization development»«specific augmentation
profile commonality
involves utilization
of biological construct
enhancement with
cybernetic adaptation
for personality-level
command identity
Submergence»«continue to next
evolution of sampling»
It does not escape this poster that these messages appear to be “counting down” in their Directives. I wonder who’s Number One.
Edited for readability