Banning repeated gankers from highsec

[Tecros_Shtemerk]

ahaaaaa, actualy you are talking about yourself

[Alexi_Stokov]

@Solonius_Rex

@DrysonBennington

Ganking on a gate would therefore delay the response time of CONCORD to a gank in a belt, mission site or anomaly. All locations that gankers have been known to gank in.

Wouldnt this mean that we are not allowed to gank, at all? Cause any ganking, anywhere in any system will draw concord out, and delay ganking to any other location in the same system.

And wouldn’t that mean that if there is no ganking then concord themselves would not exist as there would be no need to exist?

[QuakeGod]

And then Dryson would have no reason to exist. I think you’re on to something here…

[Ima_Wreckyou]

@DrysonBennington

Therefore ganking in High Sec is an exploit because CONCORD is always pulled to a different location such as a gank in an asteroid belt far away from the gate that the actual gank is taking place at.

Hey Dryson the spacelawyer, still in that NPC corp I see . What a futile and puny attempt at space lawyering. You must be really desperate. How is the smartbombing going?

[NotTheSmartestCookie]

Thnx for finding & posting this. It will be useful to counter the lies from the forces of Evil.

[Noragen_Neirfallas]

I’m good. They even call me ‘Good Guy Noragen’

[Heera-o_Helugo]

I too am posting in this thread.

[z0rberg]

Marked.