Hey guys,
Relic sites fan here, and it could be my luck, but after around 50 sites, its consistently bad. I am in 0.0 and the max I get is like 10-20 millions. It is not worth running and not worth appearing on any scan. Would it be possible to completely remove them or make them worthy? I understand them being bad in empire because it’s risk free, but 0.0 involves some risk. Anyone else thinking like that?
Cheers.
2 Likes
Please get rid of combat sites and wormholes too!
I could gain so much more ISK if all the sites I scan are relic sites.
Yeah! Screw other players, amirite?
Personally I think CCP should buff the loot tables for all sites…
Also raise mission pay and NPC bounty’s as well…
CCP has been swinging the nerf bat at those for way too long…
1 Like
I have to admit, I thought I had made a good ‘bad sarcastic suggestion’, but yours surpasses it!
2 Likes
Hey man, thanks for your suggestion. It just bothers me that exploration sites in 0.0 give way less than say, HF that gives 100m/hour in high sec with 0 risk.
I didnt say screw other players, read it again, I asked to make them worthy, too. The loot tables are just plain bad and many just ignore those sites because of it.
As for NPC bounties, well, incursions are still paying ridiculous amounts, so you can do that I guess.
1 Like
It just bothers me that exploration sites in 0.0 give way less than say, HF that gives 100m/hour in high sec with 0 risk.
Yea, that sounds like a balance issue to me. Those numbers shouldn’t be that high for the amount of risk it takes.
don’t ghost sites (data sig) provide the biggest payout in null sec and drop capital components?
also ghost sites (again data) in wormholes provide implant blueprints worth over 1b.
Yea, they do.
But those are dangerous, so it’s quicker and risk-free to skip them.