Yes.
But in case of signature and tracking mechanics it’s not a much buff. But it will certanly helps cap ships to kill an annoying insects
above yours + 1
So frig size have 1 damage ratio to crusiers, crusiers 1 to BS, BS 1 to caps
But frigs vs BS have only 0.5, and against caps only 0.25.
You said hull size and said nothing about it stacking just -50% each hull size above. The way it reads is a simple -50% then -100%. I do know what you mean but i am taking it at at face value due to the fact you only wish to do all this since you got punched in the Ego by losing a carrier with a bad fit.
No, thanks. Looks too much like an ISK before brains suggestion.
Taking away even part of the vulnerability of capital ships (support fleets) would make cap proliferation even more a thing in the game.
1 Like
As it happens, there is a documented case of an aircraft carrier being sunk by a single torpedo:
USS Albacore (SS-218) - Wikipedia
Akagi was sunk by a combination of damage from a near miss and ONE bomb at Midway.
Archer-fish sank the largest carrier ever sunk in a single spread of torps, which is the EVE equivalent of a supercarrier getting alpha’ed by a stealth bomber using its torp bonus.
Real life never took a “lucky” shot to kill a ship with a smaller ship using heavy weapons. It took courage and skill to deliver the weapons effectively.
Uhhhhhh. HAW Phoenix would like to saw hello.
I do love me some Star Trek, but with all that plot armor the Defiant is hardly a fair test for target practice.
Suggestion updated 30/06/2021. Check the OP.
And it’s still a bad suggestion.
Bring subcapital ships for support if you want to fly your capital ship effectively in pvp combat.
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.