CCP please never let Sweet Baby Inc and companies like that to mess with this game

[Rail_J_kar]

I doubt those hauler kills were opt in.

[Destiny_Corrupted]

You can literally say that about any PvP scenario in which the involved parties didn’t specifically provide verbal consent to each other before they began fighting. Like for example, a big combat fleet trapping a small combat gang and destroying them; I really doubt the latter would find the engagement to be “consensual” despite both existing for the goal and purpose of fighting.

The context of all my PvP activity is very consistently anti-null bloc/null bloc-aligned. That is, players who I believe are themselves are aggressors for whom “consent” holds very little value in any case where they aren’t on the receiving end of someone more skilled than they are. And let’s also bring up the fact that I never actually stated that PvP is evil.

[Rail_J_kar]

@Destiny_Corrupted

I really doubt the latter would find the engagement to be “consensual” despite both existing for the goal and purpose of fighting.

True, it’s not. That’s the nature of open world pvp games. People try to find advantages where they can.

@Destiny_Corrupted

players who I believe are themselves are aggressors for whom “consent” holds very little value

That seems a bit of an odd take. As long as you deem someone an aggressor, you don’t need to get consent from them. I can see why you’d target the miners, aggressing those poor asteroids.

@Destiny_Corrupted

And let’s also bring up the fact that I never actually stated that PvP is evil.

Not in this thread… I certainly recall you using those words in another thread though. You were particularly unhinged in the instance I’m thinking of, so it’s possible you were drunk.

[Destiny_Corrupted]

@Rail_J_kar

I can see why you’d target the miners, aggressing those poor asteroids.

See, there you go again, dipping from this well because you don’t have an actual, coherent argument to make.

@Rail_J_kar

Not in this thread… I certainly recall you using those words in another thread though. You were particularly unhinged in the instance I’m thinking of, so it’s possible you were drunk.

Ah, yes, “another thread.” What thread? Who knows, but there definitely was one!

[Rail_J_kar]

I suppose, I could go find it.

It was a thread about vanguard, and the op said it was awful, because first person shooter things.

[Destiny_Corrupted]

This one?

Vanguard - Terrible WIP

They’re going to add mining to this garbage pile, people are going to start coming to the forum to whine and complain about not being able to safely PvE in peace, and it’s going to be great. We’re going to get yet another vector for griefing carebears into salty rage-quits, and I’m all for it.

Aside from me doing your work for you in order to help you argue against me and disprove what I’m saying, I think that you’re severely lacking in being able to understand context and nuance. The players I’m referring to in that post are the same ones I’m referring to in my posts in this thread. I never once made the connection that carebears complaining about not being able to safely PvE in peace are necessarily high-sec miners getting suicide-ganked. This is simply how I refer to your average Initiative or PH member.

[Rail_J_kar]

no, different one.

[Destiny_Corrupted]

¯ \ _ (ツ) _ / ¯

I can only do so much.

[Rail_J_kar]

If I could search your messages, I’d just search of “evil.”

[Destiny_Corrupted]

You can. Just click the magnifying glass in the upper-right, then the three-line icon. Make sure you’re searching in the proper sub-forum.

You’re wasting your time though. I’m very consistent in my postings. I even keep detailed personality fact sheets for quick reference so that I can properly characterize all the posts of all of my personas, so that the messaging from all of my Aikos, Wesfarns, Epeens, Ios, Lucases, Gixes, Githanys, Aishas, Drysons, Gerards, etc. is as consistent as possible. You’re not going to find something where I contradict myself on the same character.

[Rail_J_kar]

Hmm… thread might have gotten deleted. The diversity threads often do… and there were some activist types in the ISD around that time as well.

@Destiny_Corrupted

You’re wasting your time though. I’m very consistent in my postings. I even keep detailed personality fact sheets for quick reference so that I can properly characterize all the posts of all of my personas,

imo,. you saying pvp is evil is quite in character for this account. At least your presence on the forum anyway.

[ISD_Drew]

Closed.

1. Specifically restricted conduct.

The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to courteous when disagreeing with others.

In order to maintain an environment where everyone is welcome and discussion flows freely, certain types of conduct are prohibited on the EVE Online forums. These are:

• Trolling
• Flaming
• Ranting
• Personal Attacks
• Harassment
• Doxxing
• Racism & Discrimination
• Hate Speech
• Sexism
• Spamming
• Bumping
• Off-Topic Posting
• Pyramid Quoting
• Rumor Mongering
• New Player Bashing
• Impersonation
• Advertising

2. Specifically restricted content.

EVE Online holds ESRB Teen and PEGI 12 ratings. All content posted to the EVE Online forums must be teen rated.

In addition to this, the EVE Online forums are not for discussion of real life current affairs, news, politics or religion. Discussion should revolve around EVE Online and its community.

For these reasons, specific content is prohibited on the EVE Online forums. These are:

• Pornography
• Profanity
• Real Money Trading (RMT)
• Discussion of Warnings & Bans
• Discussion of Moderation
• Private communications with CCP
• In-Game Bugs & Exploits
• Real World Religion
• Real World Politics
• Content that distorts the forum layout