Its a lot easier to remove chat logs writting than get rid of all bots tho.
From what high sec savior writings you extracted that brilliant piece of ideology? 
I see no reasons to let null sec dwellers to become dirty rich as long risk vs reward is even lower than in high sec.
Don’t assume every one who lives in Delve is as smart as their leadership is. To everything in EVE will you find someone who complains about it. There is always a group of players who find space X is better than space Y or that someone should have what they don’t have. The sandbox allows players to create a lot of things, and most often is the gain of one player a loss for another.
People will just find another way like jabber pings by scouts even if manual
I understand where you are coming from. Hisec can be very lucrative if you know what you are doing, have a ton of capital and all the production skills, most of the people have indy setups around the Forge and make a huge amount of ISK. One guy in my alliance just uses his hisec indy to pay for his nullsec life. The issue is more to do with the average or low level player and what they can get out of it, and that is what you should focus on, and I think that the reward for what I call newer less SP or rich players is too bad in hisec.
1 Like
I get it - you’re either a moron for failing to understand simple issues presented here, a troll for not caring about the simple issues presented here, or both.
For the benefit of the non-stop signs, the issue isn’t Eve caring or not caring about whatever space is occupied by who, nor who is able to take it. The issue is whether or not the principle of risk/reward should have any relevance and be applied fairly and consistency, or whether it is just fake news and propaganda and boilerplate people repeat to themselves to make themselves feel better. And along with risk/reward, similar principles such as work/reward, convenience/reward, etc.
Nonsense. I can apply to Goons tomorrow and be in. No fear of fences to stop me.
And by the way, I think your pic of the cow getting buttfracked makes my point for me much better than I could even make it myself, so thanks. And I agree with it. If you aren’t in sov nullsec under the protection umbrella of [INSERT ONE OF: goons, test, NC/PL, etc], you are getting buttfracked, no lube, no reach-around, no nothing. So again, thanks for making my point for me - a picture is indeed worth a thousand words.
1 Like
I’ve just explained it in the comment you’ve quoted me. You don’t get the same resources nor the same quantities in high-sec as you can from low- and null-sec. This has always been this way and it’s intentional.
All null sec regions should see a balance of this kind:
If there is players stuff destroyed in particular system, there is a lot of anomalies and good loot in that system, then if nothing of player stuff is destroyed for a while in the same system, the rate of anomalies spawning is very poor in the system, and loot is worse a lot.
Sacrifices to loot fairy will have to flow.
3 Likes
This!
We could in theory all live peacefully in EVE, be mining away happily, farming NPCs, and end all violence between players. Then you’d have no risk (other than from NPCs) and all the rewards. So in a sense is the risk fake. It’s player-made.
It’s then because some players want what others have, and they take it away and do it over their dead bodies. They not only want the resources, but they want power and authority over others. It’s all fake, because it’s just a game, but also very real at the same time.
2 Likes
I want to thank Whitehound for this. He unintentionally (like a broken clock that just happens to be right twice a day) crystallized the issue much better than I could have done in 1000 words.
5 Likes
I am so glad I put down my coffee before you posted that…classic!
1 Like
3 Likes
Wait, why no bee in high-sec? They’re in high-sec, too! Fix it! 
They will move out as null sec wil be new high sec.
3 Likes
I still think the OP should live in a WH and leech the goodness out of NS like a good kulak.
I understand your point, but my point is, why isn’t the goodness already in the WH?
Because if everywhere was equally good then going places wouldnt be a conflict driver I guess?
1 Like
Then lower the risk, and up the convenience factor in wormholes, and up the risk and lower the convenience factor in sov null?
Also, who said anything about making every place equally good? I don’t want highsec to be equally good. I want things based on risk/reward/etc, like the propaganda says.
You’d like that wouldn’t you?Well tough luck go back to the hole you crawled out of and stay there and continue being a salty hippie