Clarification - Is a "necro" considered a "bump"?

I just read a closed post in which a user was asking if “necro” posting was against the rules. He was referred to the EVE Forum Rules of Conduct, particularly the entry that prohibits “bumping”.

The problem is, the Rules of Conduct don’t explain what “bumping” is. I’m not trying to be pedantic and demand that everything be spelled out, but the flip side of that is that, when you use slang terms, there is ambiguity.

“Bumping” and “Necroing” are not commonly understood to be the same things. “Necroing” is not “bumping”, nor is it a form of same.

“Bumping” is commonly referred to a poster, usually the original poster, adding trivial content to a thread for the purpose of raising it to the top of the list of threads.

“Necroing” is commonly identified as adding to a thread that has not had a comment for a significant period of time.

As far as I am concerned, “bumping” is a waste of everyone’s time, similar to “spamming”.

But as a curator of information, I have never understood the opposition to necroing. In general, we always want information collected and centralized. If the discussion already exists, why start a new topic? Just so people can re-hash the same discussions again? If we discourage people from necro-posting, how can we then have the moral grounds to encourage them to use the search feature to seek answers to their questions, if they can’t comment on older threads?

To me, the community is better served with one thread per subject rather than 10.

In any case, I’d like to know, definitively, if “necroing” is considered “bumping” and by extension against the Code of Conduct, as previous discussion on the matter seemed to suggest this, but not conclusively.

CCPs definitions are so ambiguous and the latitude for devs and ISD so broad to interpret them, that it’s pretty pointless to try and have a discussion about it.

Here’s how it works for the most part. If the poster is a friend of the ISD/DEV then they can pretty much post, bump, or necro whatever you want. If you are not, you get a ban for the flimsiest of excuses.

If I just got an official “Yes” or “No” and then the thread was locked, I’d thank them kindly and move on with my day.

Figures any thread talking about bumping is likely to mention them.

1 Like

Threads are supposed to auto lock after 90 days. Sometimes this does not work. In The case you are referring too, the user was pulling up posts from over a year ago and commenting on them to bump them back to the top. Many of these threads are in regards to old topics that are no longer relevant.

If a thread is over 90 days old, it should auto lock. if It doesn’t, make a new thread. It sparks fresh conversation.

As this answers your question i will go ahead and close this.

1 Like