Maybe you are the idiot in this situation?
Ty for proving me right
Again
Right bout what?
What the hell are you on about?
This is like you are having somekind of imaginary discussion that has nothing to do with what was actually said here.
âŚin regards to High Sec not being âsafeâ enough, was the start of this chain, to remind you.
If this is the perceived problem, then cottonwooling the Starting Players further would be the conclusion.
Fyi, Im not Anderson.
Her views are hers, not mine.
You asked where players that want risk/challenge can go, I answered.
Why does the author matter?
I have only replied to your comments, not opened one with you.
It matters because you are trying to conflate my posts/views with someone elses, in your replies to me.
If thats what you are assuming, I cant be held responsible for your misconception, twirly moustache man.
Its not an assumption, its demonstrable.
You are responsible for your posts conflating me with someone elses views, not me, hacked-haired bitter woman.
PS: My mustache isnt twirlyâŚ
Bowheads are not a ânoobâ ship.
They also have next to nothing to do with mining, or HS security.
What is this crap in this thread.
Iâm not an idiot. I donât believe that Ramona and Dom are idiots either.
Interestingly all 3 of us have independantly reached exactly the same conclusion about what you are doing in this thread. That would be of significance to some people. It could even cause a person to reconsider their ability to clearly communicate their views (assuming that to be their intention all along).
Not you though Salvos.
No doubt you will take nothing from it and it will bounce harmlessly off the dozens of layers of armour plates that protect your ego. Ego tanked. That is you.
I like that. Ego tanked.
/me feels clever.
Idk, but youâre part of the conversation
Rekt
Oh and seeing you only quote bits and then decide to become ignorant
What the hell are you on about
You give yourself too much significance.
Just because three monkeys enjoy eating their poop, does not mean itâs good for health.
On a side note, maybe for the skin.
There are two discussions and Salvos and I are each in a separate part.
I donât know what Salvos is on, I was replying to the part where some people say âgankers are enjoyable for new playersâ. I stated that YOU are not new players and all your arguments going in this direction are biased. You will give more importance to the arguments that are pro your opinion and give less to the arguments that are con.
What you make him lose when ganking a beginner and what he perceived as lost are two different things, and that is my point. For you itâs nothing, for him it may be enough to make him stop that game.
Bowheads are fine and do what they are intended to do.
Follow standard freighting protocol/precaution commensurate with the value of the freight, and you will likely be just fine.
Its an unusual ship, with an unusual role, but perfectly capable of fulfilling that, especially in HS where CONCORD has your back.
I prefer the term âTruth tankedâ.
Your lies arent relevant, no matter how many of you pile them on.
Ramona McCandless hits your Armour Plated Ego tank for 0 damage .
Dom Arkaral hits your Armour Plated Ego tank for 0 damage.
Sindara TâSoni hits your Armour Plated Ego Tank for 0 damage.
[Warp drive activated]
Exactly.
0 damage.
If you cant even scratch me, you should probably re-think your fit.
That we can all agree I think.
We all have been new players and our experiences when we were informed our opinion. Any bias perceived is as a result of what or who we were exposed to. Given that ganking is now arguably the only genuine risk out of station a new player is exposed to, how do they grasp that thats what the game is about and learn from it if they are not exposed to any risk?
Newsflash: HS and rookie systems are not all that EVE has to offer.
I cant respond as you have made it clear you dont want me to conflate you into a topic just because you talked about it, sorry.