Cba.
If it doesnt, it should.
Certainly thats how it was presented/advertised for the program to begin in the first place.
And now is all the more forceful argument to discontinue it.
Cba.
If it doesnt, it should.
Certainly thats how it was presented/advertised for the program to begin in the first place.
And now is all the more forceful argument to discontinue it.
Why? Tbh I havent seen a convincing argument why it shouldnt be this way other than âbecause I dont benefitâ.
I dont know much about the CSM but if its based on a democratic process then of course the most organised, richest vested interests will grab the power.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4eeewi/eli5_the_t20_scandal/
BoB was the richest too.
This can be remedied, by simply applying a 1max member from any Corp/Alliance, to occupy a CSM seat.
Why should it be? Thats not how democracy works
Yeah, then they had an âaccidentâ
So as to prevent any Corp/Alliance gaining too much influence/representation on the CSM.
1 member each, is enough.
Currently its not the best candidates being elected, its the ones from Corps/Alliances that want their guys on the CSM to influence game development, in their interests.
Just like CCP had acident with chinese singularity server. It turns out devs there were really into pockets of players. Players even directly bought in game stuff from chinese operators of server.
Right, and on what basis do you oppose those interests?
Whose rights are you seeking to protect?
A lot of federations have limited seatings for their members so that the larger members canât dictate policy to their smaller members.
CSM is not about rights of anyone.
Its about an intermediary body between players and CCP.
Its not possible to overlook the concerns involved in 3/10 CSM being GoonWaffe, as them somehow being uniquely immune to ingame politics while carrying that tag.
What if next year its 6 GoonWaffe CSM?
And thats not about the rights of players?
Fair enough, I assumed it was. Never mind then. If it has nothing to do with me, then go ahead.
Yeah but he still has avoided the basis of all of this, so Im not going to attempt to persue it.
I know where it goes.
Then boo â â â â â â â hoo no one cares
CSM donât take decisions about the game, CCP do
The rest of null would care if it would be composed of some other highly effective organized bodies beside Imperium.
So, actually no one beside Imperium.
Yeah⌠Except its an advisory board not a Federation or government
You talked about democracies.
And a Federation does not have to be democratic by definition.
CSM is not a Federation, by any stretch of definitionâŚ
What objection do you have to a 1 max limit on a CSM seat from any one Corp/Alliance?
I wasnt the one claiming it was. Why reply to me about it?