Discussion about "Into the Abyss" update

Because you are a troll. You exploit this Forum for spam. You hijack this thread to force your own agenda, while people try to have a fact-based discussion with mutual respect. You come here and take the liberties of this forum to spread your toxic conspiracy theories. r/EVE allows a lot more than the Forums would usually do. But you would have been banned there a hundred times. You are not adding to the discussion. You’re disrupting it.
That’s why you should get a gag, if only for a few weeks to learn how to participate in a reasonable way.

That’s bs. You have hijacked this thread and make every other discussion about the “Into the Abyss” update impossible, by again and again posting the exact same stuff. You try to enforce your agenda onto everyone. There was a vivid and lively discussion about different aspects of it, before you came along and spammed a freaking 111 posts in this single thread. You have nothing new to add. @ISD_Buldath can you not please step in. That’s 111 posts which say exactly the same thing and force us to spiral about nonsense, that really destroy the purpose of OP’s thread and the Forums altogether. Thanks.

1 Like

?

Remember your 99% statements that you never sourced?

I think you either need a walk outside, or return to twitter/reddit where your crap flies…
It doesnt, here.

Your constant attempts to derail thread and censure me, dont work here.

1 Like

Er, guys…? I’ve totally lost track of what we’re actually talking about anymore…

1 Like

TLDR:
No mutation on T2.
T1 mutation leads to automatic success for a T2 result.

Neither really excites me, to be honest. I think if you want to roll the dice you should be able to use whatever module you want (stupidity be damned).

1 Like

Stupidity in this case would be allowing T2 modules to be mutated, as they can be produced on demand, and result would infringe on the DED/LP market, and cause T2 sink.

All the trolls here know that they will be used on T2, in vast majority, and thats what they want, cos its win-win for them. Less T2 on the market (due to sink) = better T2 prices, and the successful mutations eat into the DED/LP market, at worst as a T2.5, and worst as even better.

One could also make the argument that T1 modules can effectively be farmed on demand as well.

2 Likes

Thats fine.
Then receive an automatic success mutation into a T2 module.

Lol. You’re a joke.

1 Like

Why?

T1->T2 on an automatic roll is pretty good.

What did you expect from a T1 module?

You are obsessed with this topic, thats the problem. Take a step back and look at the evidence. You did not bring any evidence to support your claim. So far everyone told you that they dont have any evidence pointing to your claim as well. It looks like you are simply fueled by hatred to T2 producers, i dont know why.

As long as you dont bring any evidence for your claims i cant take you seriously and i think after all these posts moving in circles everything is said about it.

4 Likes

Automatic success mutation for T1 modules would effectively destroy the T2 market for those kind of modules. Also, there are different meta types of T1 modules so you could just take the cheapest one and get a T2 version.

1 Like

Then what tier modules do you think mutids will be used on the most?

Well said. +1

1 Like

Depends on the cost/availability of mutids.

Probably T2 because it be the cheapest alternative to upgrading to a Faction equivalent. Of course, this depends on the cost of mutaplasmids.

Responded on wrong alt. I didnt address you with that question.

Nonetheless, yes, probably T2, hence leading to T2 sink (raising prices) and mutated T2 eating into DED/LP module markets.

Strongly dependent on the item group, what ppl need and how cheap or available plasmids will be. There are alot of different factors to put in. The system is a free system so it will be everyone own choice. In order to interfere with the current market on the level you expect you would require extremely high drop rates. Thats why i said there is no evidence for your claim.

Your answer completely refused to address the question.

Ill be more specific.
For what we know now:
Which will mutids be most used on:

  1. T1
  2. T2
  3. DED/LP

No it doesnt. I just limit the speculation because there is no hard data to be certain. The only thing that can be surely said by the data available is that your claim cannot be proven. If you think your claim is correct then start gathering data on SiSi or the forums and present some proof. So far you are highly speculative and ignore any points against you. There is no reason to furtehr discuss this with you.

2 Likes