Discussion about Moderation


(The Dunning Kruger) #9

Moderation is the job of ISDs and Falcon. What you’re hinting at is self-moderation, which isn’t quite the same thing, and I wish you the best of luck trying to teach that to those that should exercise it. I think I’ll have more success teaching a monkey how to write poems.


(Solstice Projekt) #10

*sighs*

: - )


(Salvos Rhoska) #11

Amusing thread.

Thanks for justifying to me how badly I’m wrecking your agendas by simply speaking the truth.

Nice effort to troll me and lie about me to get me removed.

I’m a little hurt you didnt invite me by name here.
I had to accidentally wander in here off the GD list.

PS: Inb4 lock.


(Avaelica Kuershin) #12

I think perhaps the title should have been “Discussion about Self Moderation”

Apparently there is a spam detection plugin for discourse.


(Solstice Projekt) #14

You are not Dinsdale. There is no conspiracy working against you, neither an open nor a closed one. The enemy you are seeing there does not actually exist. Sheesh…

If I wanted to get you removed, I would just do it the same way as last time, Salvos. : - )

Anyhow, sorry for not tagging you. : p

Sure, but that would have not acted as bait for ISDs, right? : - )

Also, spam is relative. What Salvos, Dom, Dracvlad, Teckos (have not seen him for a while) are doing is technically not spamming, yet is it pretty disruptive.


(Salvos Rhoska) #15

Discussion of Moderation is specifically restricted/prohibited.
Note thread title “Discussion about Moderation”, and content in OP:


(Solstice Projekt) #16

Can someone please explain him what this thread is about …
… because he will not listen to me anyway …
… and he is stuck in this weird mode again.

Salvos … you basically prove my point about what I have written about you. Yet … again!


(Solstice Projekt) #17

Spamming this over and over again will not do you any good, Salvos. : - )


(Mortlake) #18

Stop discussing it then.

Reported.


(Salvos Rhoska) #19

I have not discussed moderation.
OP has.
I just posted the rules.

Discussion about Moderation

Look at title of thread, and content in OP, and tell me that isn’t “Discussion of Moderation”, as specifically restricted/prohibited by the rule shown in the link above.


(StonerPhReaK) #20

What is Salvoshed? If its anything like a swirly. I don’t want it.


(Salvos Rhoska) #21

Not so wild random appears:

That’s an impressive amount of clicks for likes.


(StonerPhReaK) #22

Thanks. So I’m guessing it has something to do with you.


(Salvos Rhoska) #23

Nope, has nothing to do with me.
You and “them” did that, all on your own.

You’ve clicked “like” no less than 5200 times on those three.
I hope your mouse can handle it…


(StonerPhReaK) #24

Its the LAGL thread. What did you expect sixteen clicks? My mouse clicks fine. No worries though Salvos, I like you in my own way. Didn’t mean to attract your attention in this topic that speaks on moderation. In whatever form it may be perceived. Feel free to jab all you want.

I think I have been salvoshed. I hope this washes off…


(Salvos Rhoska) #25

Oh look, the people you clicked “like” on 5200 times and whom are your top 3 likers, also match your top 3 replies:

more%20evi


(StonerPhReaK) #26

I hadn’t noticed. Is this supposed to mean something?


(Salvos Rhoska) #27

You’ve “liked” these three characters 5200 times in total.
They are also your top 3 likers.
Plus the same three are your top 3 replies.

How about you tell us what that means?


(Whitehound) #28

Looks like they’re friends. :scream::sunglasses:


(StonerPhReaK) #29

Never not post in moderation?