Faction destroyers

well I mean based on what other people have said, edencom ships are like these ships that is not balanced then slowly adjusted to be fair.

Nah, EDENCOM were introduced to give people obsessed with meta something to buy once they had their Trig ships all bought.

Over time EC ships will get buffed to make them the new meta then theyll get nerfed when the next “best thing ever” comes out.

how does CCP decide on adding stuff anyways? can u write a email to them asking them to add stuff? or do they just do random patches?

Sometimes they listen to things we propose in “features and ideas”.

For example the Noctis was a player proposed ship that was added to the game a few years after the proposal was made.

Just put ideas in the “player features and ideas” section of the forums but don’t claim it is a “good” idea - let someone else make that determination.

1 Like

I think a catalyst does more dps than an auto cannon tempest and at small blaster range it might not be able to hit a catalyst.

Sorry to burst your bubble but a tempest does 1400dps with autocannons and at small blaster range, that catalyst would be toast because it just hit 2x heavy neuts and cannot move or shoot anymore.

Then it gets pinned by a grappler and became a killmail.

wait, the tempest is a battleship, the catalyst is like a destroyer. why would anyone want to fight a battleship in a destroyer anyways? thats like suicide. (unless tactical destroyer)

Yeah probably a 900 dps catalyst would die to it’s drones

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.