Feature idea: Ask Aura — AI as a bounded lore/context interpreter, not a content generator

My work has been asking people for practical AI use cases, so I’ve been thinking about where AI actually makes sense in EVE.

Part of me thinks Aura team is already all over this but just wanted to say hi.

I don’t mean AI-generated art, AI-written lore, or AI tactical advice. I mean something much narrower and safer:

An in-game Aura assistant that helps players understand New Eden by interpreting FC(CCP)-approved source material.

At its foundation, AI is useful when it can work against a defined body of knowledge. EVE already has that: official lore, faction histories, item descriptions, EVE Academy, patch notes, dev blogs, support articles, and years of world-building.

The feature would be less “generate new content” and more:

Ask better questions of EVE’s existing canon and mechanics.

Examples:

  • “What’s the difference between Caldari and Gallente?”

  • “What is CONCORD versus EDENCOM?”

  • “Why is Jita important?”

  • “What does Ishukone represent compared to Kaalakiota?”

  • “Explain this faction/item/event in plain language.”

  • “What should a returning player understand about this system?”

The important guardrail: it should not invent canon.
It should answer from official CCP sources, provide links/citations where possible, and clearly distinguish lore, game-play mechanics, and policy/support information.

To me, this is a strong AI use case because EVE’s universe is incredibly rich, but the context is scattered and hard to access while actually playing. An “Ask Aura” archive assistant could improve immersion, on-boarding, and player attachment without giving tactical advantage or replacing human creativity.

Would something like this be a reasonable feature direction, or is it still too risky/unrealistic for EVE?

1 Like

Fsck AI. Really.

1 Like

So why not specificity?

There are multiple decades worth of EVE lore to read up on via several sources. Takes 2 seconds to Google it…

why google if it can be done better…

One should always strive for excellence.

Excellence is being able to read and draw your own conclusions, not being spoon-fed by AI…

3 Likes

That’s why you use a lever to adjust the appropriate level of spoon feeding.

It’s like “this is A” and “this is B” this is what the lore says. make of that what you will

Some of us have graduated to a fork.

1 Like

AI cannot do it better. AI hallucinates the living crap out of even the most approved sources.

This AI would also remove player interaction by killing the need to research, discover and consume content that other players created and host on their sites.

4 Likes

I think you make a good point that AI should not invent canon.

For summaries and easier access to information from existing lore AI could be useful.

AI is bad and so are you for suggesting it.

So …
When the AI quotes EVE University’s Uniwiki articles…? Should it quote its sources?

and Yes… The OP would be a good thing for AI use, IF it would tend to be correct, sadly in practice it appears to be more in error.

1 Like

Yes.

AI usually comes pretty close. But I’ve noticed sometimes it does not research far enough back and seems to take info from other incorrect AI for source.