Thats another lie.
I havent posted even posted 300 times, let alone repetitively.
Almost all of yours have been trolling, especially of me.
Dom, Fey spammed the same post 5times.
Fay telling an ISD to HTFU after she spammed the same post 5 times and they got removed. Priceless.
You can HTFU too. Yesterday you spam the same thing over and over and over only to concede later that it didn’t make a bit of sense. Somehow that’s okay??
And you didn’t spam the same thing up to 20 times in a row?
Both here and the “About Bumping” or any other thread you’ve ever been in?
That’s without counting all posts you made ignoring key facts, or your off-topic posts
Act your age
The majority of bumps are to stop someone from making the gate or the docking range and in situations like that they are likely to be pointed. The only one that is not is bumping people out of tethering range when they are tethered.
There are reasons to do that, you do not want to make freighters too hard to gank, getting the right balance so its doable and that someone wants to do it is key. But I am not going to go through this in any detail, because it is part of the balance equation that the devs would have to do.
Don’t forget that after they increased the EHP of wrecks thus removing the emergent gameplay of shooting freighter wrecks that AG was doing they then decided to balance off against that by increasing freighter EHP by apply the Damage Control EHP to freighters when they had originally decided not to do it. So from that example CCP will balance it.
Fey and Dom, I cant but laugh at your dishonesty.
Im legit laughing at accusing me of spamming when the other guy just posted the same post 5 times, and the other does nothing but troll.
Yes, and as your response was previously, a warp timer in regards to bumping would not necessitate an EHP reduction because bumping can be applied to all ships, and bump mechanics would remain the same in all sectors of space.
Its irrational to start adjusting the EHP of ships, just cos bump mechanics are set to a 3min limit which can be reset with a simple point.
You’re saying that not me, and I have no interest in what you are saying here, I know what I mean however.
I have already said that I see no reason to adjust freighter EHP with a three minute timer which can be reset with a point, why labor the point?
I’ve literally tried breaking it down to you yet you fail to understand. All that is left at that point is to question your mind.
This thread is pointless and you are a waste of time. Enjoy being bad. 
Good, so you join us that agree a 3min max bump duration with a point resetting it is an acceptable change.
Now try reading the context of the post I replied to.
I’ll even help you out
Teckos_Pech
Bumping is a niche mechanic used in freighter ganking and possibly to keep a super on grid.
Salvos_Rhoska
Just use a point/bubble instead.
That is worse…
How so?
I was very specific in my reply.
I am not going to scroll up to your post, but you said something about no bubbles in hisec if I recall correctly and there is Teckos saying supers and that is why Salvos said “/ bubble” Just so you know unless the GM’s make an error by dropping returned supers in Jita as they have done every so often, there are no supers in hisec.
If you want to be sarcastic, please make sure you do it right.
The topic is Gankers and Freighters, not supers.
While bumping is indeed used to hold supers down, it is also used to hold freighters down in preparation for a gank; given that most freighter ganks happen in hisec the suggestion to use a bubble was inane and misplaced.
My dear boy, please try to improve your abilities at sarcasm, you are letting down the English by failing so hard, I am almost ashamed at your lack of sarcastic ability, which most of my countrymen normally excel at. Shame on your for letting the side down…
Sarcasm?
There was none involved, please try to remedy your lack of reading comprehension.
Your reply to Salvos was inane and misplaced, perhaps you should have aimed your comment at Teckos and asked him whether supers were in hisec. But I must say being told I lack reading and comprehension skills when you are the one that failed is priceless.
You never fail to fail…
Teckos wasn’t the one suggesting the use of a bubble to tackle freighters 
While he did mention supers it was merely in passing as bumping is also used to hold them down outside of hisec.
Would you care to fail again?
Notice the / ?
Reading and comprehension is not a strong point of yours is it?
Yeah I noticed it, / being used to indicate the word “or”; there is no option for use of a bubble in hisec, the only applicable options being a point or a bump.
What were you saying about my reading comprehension?
You know you are digging yourself even deeper…