You’ll never believe what a little bird just told me.
1 Like
That you suck?
1 Like
At being a victim.
Yes.
1 Like
since we are not talking about ganking but random stuff i am gonna add my random stuff and ask if someone want to buy my ccp corpses ? got 5 new corpses
1 Like
- Tether grants immunity from being targetted and damaged.
Before CCP nerfed tether to not work for gankers. We used to gank with -10 toons. Ie. criminals. We could have been attacked preemptively, but not when tethered. Although during this time, AGs had at least some counterplay against gankers. After tether was disabled for too low security status, all but very few gankers started tagging all their toons up. That means they are not criminals enymore and cannot be attacked preemptively.
- After nerfs to ganking 2022, you don’t get tether if you security status is too low.
- Security status of -2.0 or below: Cannot tether in 1.0 security systems.
- -2.5 or below: Cannot tether in 0.9 systems.
- -3.0 or below: Cannot tether in 0.8 systems.
- -3.5 or below: Cannot tether in 0.7 systems.
- -4.0 or below: Cannot tether in 0.6 systems.
- -4.5 or below: Cannot tether in 0.5 systems.
At the same time they nerfed docking in hgihsec, everywhere, the threshold for that is -5.0. UBelow that you can dock even in 1.0 system.
Since we already tether at citadels or are docked, then suspect flag for red safety won’t change a thing. It just nerfs small gank ops - new players into this content. And it will completely remove station ganking. It won’t be possible to gank at station without scripting, unless there is some chat command to change safety we don’t know about lol.
Cries to nerf ganking will never stop. The more CCP nerfs ganking the more will carebears cry because they saw that their crying worked and thus cry harder. And these “we want to fight gankers” arguments are nonsense. Gankers are tethering at citadels. Carebears can unite and wardec those citadels. There is nothing stopping them from it. But they never did, instead they cried how unfair it is because we have Goonsfriends + BLACKFLAG. on our side and they can’t ever win against that, therefore they cannot fight us and demanded the citadels to be nerfed instead so we can’t use them.
And here you are, crying.
Ganking will eventually be removed from HS, as it should.
And Eve will enter a Golden Age…
1 Like
nah, it won’t
1 Like
You smoking some strong stuff Monkey
2 Likes
So far, I haven’t read a single nerf that i disagree with. They have all made sense.
Thank you for the info.
Ganking should be sacrificing your ship to destroy other ships, not making yourself indestructible.
2 Likes
I agree except not be able to dock in my own citadel. That is illogival nonsense.
But you will always make up some lore nonsense to justify it. So don’t even reply.
2 Likes
Okay… I will agree that you should be able to dock in your own citadel. Only because I would LOVE for Concord to come beat down your front door by blowing up your Home!
Come on… do you really think Concord would be so pathetic that they’d just leave? Concord is great at giving us some fireworks to watch!
“Want to dock up in your structure? Go ahead, but we’re coming in after you!”
Considering that Concord can one-shot any ship, I’m betting that they can do some pretty significant damage to even a Fortizar! I’m betting that gankers would consider it just too costly to lose all their cats AND a Fortizar just to take down a mining barge! LOL!
1 Like
He asked you not to reply.
Clean your ears out monkey
Did i justify the nerf? No. Back to your cage!
1 Like
2 Likes
Better
1 Like
CONCORD is so pathetic that we are playing them and make them fools everyday.
We gank at gate. CONCORD shows up and kills us. CONCORD stays there patrolin the area against further criminal activity.
So we dock and undock stupid free rookie ship. CONCORD immediately teleports to us and destroys our rookie ships. Then they stay there patrolling that citadel/station like idiots while we go and gank at gate again.
They are so stupid and easy to toy with.
Ah, the exploit that CCP is ok with, good point.
You, my friend, are a pseudo-intellectual.
Words matter.
@Bakster_Kane is NOT the only one that feels this way.
Your side is losing the argument.