“My suggestion of hitting you on the head with a stick isn’t to hurt you, it’s only to hear an interesting sound effect, lols!”
No, it doesn’t work like that.
If your suggestion has a set of very direct, specific consequences, then all of those consequences are intended. Either admit to it, or find another solution that only results in the effect you seek (that is, a solution that makes ganking more fun for the victim, without nerfing ganking). Good luck.
Completely separate considerations here. A change isn’t judged only by how many players it affects.
Removing all of the ISK and items from the top 10 richest players in the game, and redistributing it all to everyone else, would negatively affect only a small amount of players, and create a lot of enjoyment for everyone else. Should we do that too, then?
Where and when did they say anything of that sort?
Then argue that the current tag mechanic needs a balancing pass, possibly by making the tags rarer (and by effect more expensive).
And it wasn’t a buff to ganking so much as it was bringing ganking in line with other activities in which tasks you don’t want to do yourself could be outsourced to other players.
If certain players find hauling to be boring, then they shouldn’t haul. I don’t expect anyone to do anything they don’t enjoy.
So security status means nothing and the consequence means nothing.
And this:
All over the forums…
What?
Why would I do that. As I said very few people freighter gank, but those that do, gank a very large number. So on that basis make it so the larger number of players can have some fun with it. Nothing wrong with that, good game design.
Seriously what a load of codswallop. Well you gave me a good laugh while moving some ships around, have fun with your entitled gameplay, I am out of here.
Feel free to laugh as much as you want, but if you have nothing better to add, then you’ve conceded the argument.
Proof.
“They said” is a very specific accusation. Show me at least one instance of gankers saying that removing bumping would eliminate ganking.
Which part did you not understand? The question is fairly clear. We can do something that would improve the enjoyment of many at the expense of a few. Should we do it?
You’ll need to prove that your definition of fun is in line with their definition of fun. That is, however, aside from the argument I made, which you’ve ignored.
Well, since you’ve lost the argument, there really isn’t a reason to stay, I agree.
Fair enough, I just don’t like the word retarded being used to describe people, or being labelled as such. I hear enough of such things about my better halves non verbal autistic child.
Bollocks. Utter bollocks. I have been in BRAVE for 7 years and at no time it was said your character should be in a NPC corp. Only when travelling through high sec it is wise to have a NPC character to circumvent the wardecs. You’re an embarrassment to the alliance.
