Ganking is a valid form of gameplay, just like PvP everywhere else in EVE Online, and it takes practice to get good at, more inside

You attack everything I say, so try taking your own advice.

I don’t attack you, I criticize what you write, big difference.

1 Like

LOL

Keep trying to convince yourself that you’re the good guy and I’m the bad guy here.

What exactly did I “attack”?

You (and everyone else) know very well who you have been attacking. Now, can we please get back on the topic of this thread?

Ganking is a valid form of play, as stated multiple times by CCP. Can it be improved? Of course it can. Should it be removed? not without NPCs getting a lot more dangerous and less avoidable. Both options would require a lot of work to implement.

2 Likes

I think CCP’s intended goal is to have players act as the ‘monsters’ seen in traditional games, and so the removal of ganking would undermine the core concept of EvE Online. Like, gankers are supposed to be hunting miners. It doesn’t mean we are bad people in real-life, or that we deserve years of abuse, it just means we are people playing the game. This is precisely why security tags exist, because they are intended to facilitate ganking.

4 Likes

Very true, after all, time and time again. CCP shows capsuleers in the lore as monsters, and players follow suit, not just those who gank.

3 Likes

Haha, James you flatter me!

:princess:t2:

1 Like

There is a clear difference between attacking a person and criticizing arguments.

If I quote something you wrote and point out inconsistency, that is criticism of content.

If I were making claims about you as a person, that would be an attack.

You may not like the conclusions I draw from your posts, but disagreement or pointing out hypocrisy is not personal aggression. It is engagement with your stated position.

If there is something specific I said that you believe crossed into personal attack, quote it. Otherwise, let’s keep this about the arguments themselves.

Ganking is NOT valid gameplay. There’s no counterplay. End of discussion.

2 Likes

I think we’re going off the track here with the ‘monster’ comparison/analogy. Ganking is just a specialized form of PVP adapted to high sec. In any other part of space same thing happens (blobbing, hot dropping, gate camping, whatever) and they’re all legitimate. Everyone in EVE minimizes their risk and maximizes their gain. That’s why solo PVP and ‘fair fights’ are pretty rare in this game.

As for the ‘monster’ part – it’s not that. CCP hasn’t put a filter on human nature, and those who wanna be more naughty or mischievous or outright ‘bad guys’ can act it out, just as in real life. You’re free to be whatever you wanna be. I’m pretty sure a lot of ‘gankers’ enjoy the ‘bad guy’ image in the game. Nothing wrong with that.

The whole question of legitimacy/validity is absurd as this is a free sandbox game. Be what you wanna be, do what you wanna do.

4 Likes

I’m just glad ganking is valid gameplay, with lots of viable counterplay.
Let’s continue the discussion!

For the record, we are not calling players monsters, just our capsuleers. Gameplay is just gameplay, but in the lore, all pvp activities are causing a massive loss of life with crews, and even more so with structures. Heck, even something as innocuous as PI, is causing a massive loss of life as shown in: https://universe.eveonline.com/chronicles/xenocracy We (our capsuleers in game) are not as innocent as some like to think in the game.

In that sense as well, then, there is no difference between different forms of PVP. They all cause loss of life.

I gotta check out that lore though.

1 Like

You men are clearly delusional.

There is no couterplay, therefore, it is not valid gameplay.

Simple.

there is counter play… escape, use a heavy tank, use dscan and escape. and its been deemed NOT an exploit, you can pull concord to be on the ready..

1 Like

The biggest problem i see is not about ganking itself, its about the definition. You can kill anyone everywhere. While Lowsec just gives you a hit on security status, Null and JSpace don’t have any negative things hitting you (besides some corp is really peed about it). Only in Highsec you get instant revenge by Concord.

But in the end you (the victim) have to prepare the same way everywhere no matter what and living in JSpace myself, i don’t have the intel a local chat gives me.

1 Like

I made a list of counterplay options:

  1. pay the gankers to gank someone else (it works!)

  2. you go elsewhere

  3. dock up

  4. fit your ship (try armor, shield, DCU, bulkheads, and rigs)

  5. warp away (try aligning, using bookmarks)

  6. use an afterburner/MWD

  7. drones (lots of options)

  8. ecm - these are literal ‘countermeasures’

  9. boosts/reps

  10. logi

  11. bait

  12. smartbombs

  13. stationcamp the gankers

  14. gatecamp the gankers

  15. wardec the gankers (we all own structures somewhere)

  16. beg

  17. whine in the forums

  18. gank the gankers - for example, Novus Ordo mines in Silen, Abudban, and Finanar - if they can gank your miner, you can gank their miner

  19. cloaky loki

  20. hunt their suspect looter

  21. kill their scouts

  22. steal their loot

  23. shoot their decloak fighters

  24. warp core stabilizer

  25. join a fleet

  26. dont go AFK

  27. scam the gankers

  28. don’t be a miner

  29. overheat

  30. warn other miners

  31. try scouting

  32. use an alt

  33. phone a friend

  34. be cool and get adopted as a ganker’s pet

  35. learn to bump

  36. try cloaking

  37. dont be greedy

  38. buy a mining permit/mining rights/multipass

  39. pay rent

  40. get good

  41. be more like Aiko Danuja

  42. praise me (and please me)

  43. dont be obnoxious

5 Likes

you are wrong sir…

“suicide ganking” in HS is simply pure piracy, true piracy…and Piracy is a form of gameplay in EvE.

if you do not like that, no one can help you not even CCP and you should go play something else.

3 Likes

ya know…
that entire list can be boiled down to:
1.) Do not be stupid

4 Likes

People arguing that ganking is a ‘problem’ in EVE….its a bit like arguing that sand bunkers are a ‘problem’ in golf and are somehow not supposed to be there.

1 Like

And just to prove it can be done….and solo too…