If stopping a gank is grief then yes I did
Well not sure what that even means , that’s more of an abstract statement then Aiko gives out
You do know that griefing is against the rules, right?
Gankers spend more game time being griefers more than miners do.
You called stopping a gank grief
I know you cannot figure it out. Hence why you could not put a single dent in any of the pirate’s operations.
I have given you all the clues already. It merely speaks to the fact that those who oppose piracy are barely literate capsuleers with no real skills to speak of.
And no, I do not mean the skills you slot and learn over time.
A greater lie has never been spoken.
1 Like
I understood what it meant.
I wonder sometimes if maybe you choose to live in a box?
What ever your trying to say we did indeed dent many pirate operations , using many types of fleets .
Thought you would 
2 Likes
Antigankers are like the insects which get crushed on the front grill of a truck. They claim success because they “slowed” the truck’s roll.
When you don’t understand rudimentary battle tactics that null sec denizens figured out over a decade or more ago, I doubt it very much.
1 Like
Easy…, and there are counters such as ECCM. Please explain how you would get around the counter measures effectively?
Ad hominin
You assume I am not aware of this, and I assume that you don’t know about the counter to this. ECCM.
Ad hominin
You tried to explain it, but you made it sound simple and easy, you ignored several other factors too.
I could not care less about your pity, what amuses me is your shallowness.
My favourite was to nuke the initial tackle with the loss of sensor range, however it only worked with -10’s because I had to make them fail that initial attempt to stop the warp, because most people were not quick enough to try to warp again. The good thing about this approach is that it is not chance based and more effective in being 100% effective. The counter is of course to not use a -10 as initial tackle and use tags to keep it so, so in the end it came down to costing more for the ganker and so you can only use it every so often.
Pretty much similar to the ECCM issue with what you suggested.
I don’t feel schooled by you at all, I feel like a am being badgered by a two year old.
I am guessing situational and circumstantial has no understanding from you.
The Prophet is puzzled. What “ganker” would ever waste a ship slot on ECCM?
This statement alone shows you are an absolutely terrible pilot.
Saying it again doth not make it true.
See above. The fact you continue to push this narrative is laughable and yet so sad at the same time.
The Prophet begs you to spell properly.
Oh? Such as?
Better tactics have already long been suggested.
It is alright friend. You have embarrassed yourself enough as it is.
High sec pirates fielding ECCM. Truly?
That is truly embarrassing for you. Do keep going
That depends on factors that you fail to understand.
Doubling down on stupid WHT…
Githany and those with her did ECM often, some people I know did it, but it was not something I did because of one of the issues that you fail to mention. Anyway I think I am going to add you to the blocked list. Done, bye bye.
How so? Care to explain what high security pirate would waste a fitting slot on countermeasures?
Elaborate.
Yes. Failed anti-“gankers” used ECM. However, high security pirates have never slotted to counter that.
Of course you are fleeing. You lost.
In other words , you lost
Not at all, I did so because he just resorted to mindless insults, a lack of detail, and a declaration that he could do it and win. I suspect that he was one of Dom’s alts, style was pretty much the same as Dom Akaral (Gix to you if your memory is too short.) And that person is way too far gone for me to bother with, sorry but that is the truth of it.
Dissapointing @Dracvlad, the prophet is very wise.
At least your gif’s are amusing.
Lol null battle tactics means squat in high sec , had so many elite PvPers lording it up, saying they are going to destroy this group and that , they soon run back to null