You have no idea as you sit in your own bubble.
1 Like
With everyone else in EVE including CCP…
It’s nice in here…we call it reality.
2 Likes
Hahaha, then you are not very observant during Hilmar’s recent Q&A on the forums I asked about bumping and got two replies. That is the reality and on the forums too, enjoy your bubble…
1 Like
A whole 2…wow…
I’m sure CCP is just tripping over themselves rushing to appease the three crybabies then…
2 Likes
Rather destroys your pathetic narrative doesn’t it, they have people looking at this issue, just so you know, but the main thing they want to change is the collision box and that might take time. They are also open to other suggestions and I gave them one which they said they would look at it.
So you are wrong wrong and wrong, and even wrong. LMAO.
1 Like
Sure sport…whatever you say…
1 Like
It is there on the forums, your narrative just exploded in your face.
1 Like
So when are these changes coming?
1 Like
He said that the collision box change will take some time, so you are good there, my interim suggestion was to enable freighters to fit a BS MWD like the bowhead to make them a little more able to warp to someone in a ceptor. I don’t expect something any time soon.
I guess you will suddenly claim forum victory for it being on the far horizon, but he said that they have a team looking at options on how to deal with it, so while I point out that there is an issue with bumping as a mechanic I am trusting CCP to eventually get around to adjusting it.
The suggestion by the OP is not going to fly for obvious reasons, I have in the past suggested some sort of bump counter, but it gets a bit messy.
I am fairly confident that the ganking community will be able to handle this even though they are no way as good as the players that were doing edgy stuff previously. The biggest question is whether they have the willpower to do it seeing as they had it so easy beforehand.
What will happen is that the carebears will get complacent and some real loot piñata’s will be running around and of course people will take advantage of it. So all will be good…
1 Like
Claiming victory in a forum is moronic. So is doing a happy dance when you can’t even say when this will happen…
But you will own this one now…
1 Like
You are so bitter, you can never let go of your bitterness can you.
False flagged again you know that this will get your flag ability reduced
Why are you making this about me now? Please stay on topic.
1 Like
Your bitterness meter is close to 100%.
I posted this:
And all I got back is this:
Yes you are bitter. For a start I don’t own anything…
False flagged again, you should stop doing that.
You have fun with that.
I look forward to the change happening, I hope it will make the conflict more interesting especially for AG and perhaps it will make it less boring for the famville types like Australian Excellence and Kusion, but they have got so used to easy farming that I doubt they have it in them to adjust.
I like the collision box adjustment in that it makes bumping harder, perhaps that bumper has to be purely bump fit to have a chance to make it work and the player doing the bumping has to be so focussed on that so multi-boxing is not really possible. So if that Bumper is now killable by a single Polarised Talos then we have an interesting change. With bumping being more difficult and people being able to warp out if they make an error and they have BM’s around the gates and of course someone to warp to then it changes it towards a better balance.
People can of course set up on gates, however the issue will be that being -10 will cost in terms of fac police intervention so the consequences of the -10 will be there so gankers will have to deal with that with those things you get from lowsec which remove security status. If that increases the profit point for freighter ganking above 1bn of cargo that is a good move because in my opinion that is too low.
I have also suggested that the tank of the freighter could be reduced if bumping is removed.
So what are the bets that offering a reasoned argument just get ignored by people who are too lazy to change and have a real challenge and who just want to troll?
Haha, no, you will be back the next day, arguing for the next “just one more nerf”.
3 Likes
It depends on whether it creates the right balance, but of course you don’t get that.
It has been established pretty clearly that your definition of the right balance is “complete safety in highsec”.
3 Likes
And you say that after I said this:
I highlighted the part that applies to you.
And you will still be back the next day, concern trolling for the next “just one more nerf".
Edit: bolded the part that applies to you
4 Likes