This is the second time in a short while, the hypercore amount needed has raised. Anyone else notice this. I had just started getting used to the changes they made last time.
1 hypercore seems to be good until about 11.3 million
2 hypercores is good until about 16.9 million
3 hypercores is good until about 22.6 million
4 hypercores is until about 28.2 million
EDIT: Hypercore raised again a 3rd time
1 hypercore seems to be good until about 10.97 million
2 hypercores seems to be good until about 16.46 million
3 hypercores seems to be good until 21.95 million
4 hypercores iseems to be good until about 27.44 million
Edit: Hypercore raised a 4th time
1 hypercore seems to be good until 10.56 million
2 hypercores seem to be good until about 15.84 million
3 hypercores seem to be good until 21.12 million
Thatās not what this thread is about dude. Different topic for a different thread.
All I know is that CCP needs to be clear and direct with how many hypercores are required for a given ISK value. Without āhackingā then numbers with regularity, no one knows if the growth rate is linear or not, if the numbers change over time or not, etc. Treating insurance like a black box is fine, but they need to be more transparent when it comes to Hypercoresā¦ otherwise it is substantially more difficult to plan ahead.
Hypernet offers that are highlighted green when you open the link is a good deal, orange are a bad deal. Thatās in general but there are some exceptions.
BTW your question is unrelated to my topic but hope I helped.
Yes, I understand they want more prominent isk sinks, but it would be nice to let us know in advance, especially since this is the twice time they have increased the hypernet amounts recently.
The lower amount per core, means the more cores needed for higher price because (I believe) if you made a graph the points would be closer together and it would show as a sharper incline.
I donāt think Iām wrong but I could be. All I know it is more expensive now.
I still donāt understand why people would buy into this stuff when itās pretty much a guaranteed loss over time. I understand the utility of this for high-profile/rare items, but for everything else, ugh.
Plus the whole ābuying your own raffleā thing is just ugly.
Agreed, but that would be better served by a different system anyway. One in which you could select a module and a range of stats, and then shop around for options.
if they dropped they are doing the right thing
if it raised they are doing a stupid move
dont know the facts because i quit hipernet there is some time
Hypercores are bought with Plex and Plex prices have fallen. If you think of the cores as another percentage based tax then you should need more cores for a given raffle value since cores also have fallen in value with Plex.
Perhaps there was no update and the cores per raffle value was never fixed but based on the price of Plex and periodically updated to be in line.